Hello I was wondering what people's experience with the EF vs RF 70-200 F2.8L especially on the newer R5 body. Is the AF any better in the RF? Any noticeable IS difference? I already have the EF II version, but with my R5 wondering if it is worth the upgrade or not. I dont care about the weight difference, really focus speed, IQ are my key drivers. Thank you.
EF II/III vs RF 70-200 f2.8L
- Thread starter neurorx
- Start date
https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-70-200mm-F2.8-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx
At the bottom of this review is a comparison with the EF III version. That‘s probably as good as you will find.
At the bottom of this review is a comparison with the EF III version. That‘s probably as good as you will find.
Upvote
0
