i m going to canon exposition in paris october 13th, maybe i ll see it !
Upvote
0
jrista said:I'm curious if this is the actual name. I mean, technically speaking, isn't the 1D X really the "1D Mark X"? All the generational marks are in roman numerals, X is just 10. So, wouldn't the next 1D be the 1D Mark XI? Or just 1D XI. One Dee Zee!
Anyway, just a curiosity.
Yeah, I am eager to see the price of current 1Dx coming down to US$3,000helpful said:Thank you so much. All you do related to rumors, especially in regards to the 1D X Mark II and other flagship bodies, is invaluable in helping me make decisions throughout the years as I strategically transition from previous generation cameras.
emko said:Stills from Video is a dumb idea for many reason, video people shot completely different then a stills person.
One wants blurry images the other does not you can not pick both so the video is either going to be flickering/juddering or smooth. Then you have the compositions video guys use motion and other things for their composition but stills have to work with one frame. Then you have the codec compression vs raw 14+bit images
what will happen is stills cameras will keep increasing in fps especially the mirror less cameras.
privatebydesign said:jrista said:I'm curious if this is the actual name. I mean, technically speaking, isn't the 1D X really the "1D Mark X"? All the generational marks are in roman numerals, X is just 10. So, wouldn't the next 1D be the 1D Mark XI? Or just 1D XI. One Dee Zee!
Anyway, just a curiosity.
If the 1DX was the tenth 1D body then maybe, but it wasn't.
1/ 1D
2/ 1D MkII
3/ 1D MkIIn
4/ 1D MkIII
5/ 1D MkIV
6/ 1DX
1/ 1D
2/ 1Ds
3/ 1D MkII
4/ 1Ds MkII
5/ 1D MkIIn
6/ 1D MkIII
7/ 1Ds MkIII
8/ 1D MkIV
9/ 1DX
IgotGASbadDude said:I understand there will be two versions of the new 1DX, one for minors and one for adults.
The "over 18 year old" version will be called the 1DXXX ;D
Click said:IgotGASbadDude said:I understand there will be two versions of the new 1DX, one for minors and one for adults.
The "over 18 year old" version will be called the 1DXXX ;D
;D ;D ;D
privatebydesign said:jrista said:I'm curious if this is the actual name. I mean, technically speaking, isn't the 1D X really the "1D Mark X"? All the generational marks are in roman numerals, X is just 10. So, wouldn't the next 1D be the 1D Mark XI? Or just 1D XI. One Dee Zee!
Anyway, just a curiosity.
If the 1DX was the tenth 1D body then maybe, but it wasn't.
1/ 1D
2/ 1D MkII
3/ 1D MkIIn
4/ 1D MkIII
5/ 1D MkIV
6/ 1DX
1/ 1D
2/ 1Ds
3/ 1D MkII
4/ 1Ds MkII
5/ 1D MkIIn
6/ 1D MkIII
7/ 1Ds MkIII
8/ 1D MkIV
9/ 1DX
The 1D and the 1Ds were always completely different cameras made for different market segments, the 1DX was marketed as the amalgamation of the two, the crossover, of course it left the 1Ds MkIII users up S___ creek but we weren't the volume buyers of 1 series cameras, the 1D folks were. Those 1Ds MkIII users are supposed to be happy with the 5DS/R's now, as if MP's was all it was about.
So when there is a next 1DX it will be a 1DX MkII, just as the 1D was followed by the 1D MkII and the 1Ds was followed by the 1Ds MkII.
dpaulham said:I was speaking to a canon tech rep yesterday about an unrelated matter but mentioned that i am waiting for the 1Dx mark Ii to be released soon. There was dead silence over the phone for a few seconds. he replied...who told me that. I stated that i do read canon rumors...more silence...he stated that none of that was true. I laughed and said...we knew about the 7D mark ii which was being field tested last summer. Oh well....company secrets are good..He knew what was up!!!
privatebydesign said:jrista said:I'm curious if this is the actual name. I mean, technically speaking, isn't the 1D X really the "1D Mark X"? All the generational marks are in roman numerals, X is just 10. So, wouldn't the next 1D be the 1D Mark XI? Or just 1D XI. One Dee Zee!
Anyway, just a curiosity.
If the 1DX was the tenth 1D body then maybe, but it wasn't.
1/ 1D
2/ 1D MkII
3/ 1D MkIIn
4/ 1D MkIII
5/ 1D MkIV
6/ 1DX
1/ 1D
2/ 1Ds
3/ 1D MkII
4/ 1Ds MkII
5/ 1D MkIIn
6/ 1D MkIII
7/ 1Ds MkIII
8/ 1D MkIV
9/ 1DX
The 1D and the 1Ds were always completely different cameras made for different market segments, the 1DX was marketed as the amalgamation of the two, the crossover, of course it left the 1Ds MkIII users up S___ creek but we weren't the volume buyers of 1 series cameras, the 1D folks were. Those 1Ds MkIII users are supposed to be happy with the 5DS/R's now, as if MP's was all it was about.
So when there is a next 1DX it will be a 1DX MkII, just as the 1D was followed by the 1D MkII and the 1Ds was followed by the 1Ds MkII.
expatinasia said:emko said:Stills from Video is a dumb idea for many reason, video people shot completely different then a stills person.
One wants blurry images the other does not you can not pick both so the video is either going to be flickering/juddering or smooth. Then you have the compositions video guys use motion and other things for their composition but stills have to work with one frame. Then you have the codec compression vs raw 14+bit images
what will happen is stills cameras will keep increasing in fps especially the mirror less cameras.
Not really. I frequently use stills from video I have taken, and that is not even 4K. They can make useful small images such as thumbnails or pictures that go with stories, articles etc.
Of course it is not ideal, but it is useful if you cannot do both at the same time.
I agree that taking stills from video is not as good as taking actual stills, but it is still a useful thing to be able to do.
jrista said:privatebydesign said:jrista said:I'm curious if this is the actual name. I mean, technically speaking, isn't the 1D X really the "1D Mark X"? All the generational marks are in roman numerals, X is just 10. So, wouldn't the next 1D be the 1D Mark XI? Or just 1D XI. One Dee Zee!
Anyway, just a curiosity.
If the 1DX was the tenth 1D body then maybe, but it wasn't.
1/ 1D
2/ 1D MkII
3/ 1D MkIIn
4/ 1D MkIII
5/ 1D MkIV
6/ 1DX
1/ 1D
2/ 1Ds
3/ 1D MkII
4/ 1Ds MkII
5/ 1D MkIIn
6/ 1D MkIII
7/ 1Ds MkIII
8/ 1D MkIV
9/ 1DX
The 1D and the 1Ds were always completely different cameras made for different market segments, the 1DX was marketed as the amalgamation of the two, the crossover, of course it left the 1Ds MkIII users up S___ creek but we weren't the volume buyers of 1 series cameras, the 1D folks were. Those 1Ds MkIII users are supposed to be happy with the 5DS/R's now, as if MP's was all it was about.
So when there is a next 1DX it will be a 1DX MkII, just as the 1D was followed by the 1D MkII and the 1Ds was followed by the 1Ds MkII.
Canon explicitly marketed the 1D X as the tenth in the series of the EOS 1 line. That included film cameras. Seems odd to me that they would amalgamate the line and explicitly label it the tenth EOS 1, then again change the naming scheme and use 1D X Mark II...the second tenth iteration? Strange.
The new model launches as the flagship in Canon’s DSLR line up – marking the 10th generation of Canon’s professional system with the most advanced EOS model ever produced.
rs said:jrista said:privatebydesign said:jrista said:I'm curious if this is the actual name. I mean, technically speaking, isn't the 1D X really the "1D Mark X"? All the generational marks are in roman numerals, X is just 10. So, wouldn't the next 1D be the 1D Mark XI? Or just 1D XI. One Dee Zee!
Anyway, just a curiosity.
If the 1DX was the tenth 1D body then maybe, but it wasn't.
1/ 1D
2/ 1D MkII
3/ 1D MkIIn
4/ 1D MkIII
5/ 1D MkIV
6/ 1DX
1/ 1D
2/ 1Ds
3/ 1D MkII
4/ 1Ds MkII
5/ 1D MkIIn
6/ 1D MkIII
7/ 1Ds MkIII
8/ 1D MkIV
9/ 1DX
The 1D and the 1Ds were always completely different cameras made for different market segments, the 1DX was marketed as the amalgamation of the two, the crossover, of course it left the 1Ds MkIII users up S___ creek but we weren't the volume buyers of 1 series cameras, the 1D folks were. Those 1Ds MkIII users are supposed to be happy with the 5DS/R's now, as if MP's was all it was about.
So when there is a next 1DX it will be a 1DX MkII, just as the 1D was followed by the 1D MkII and the 1Ds was followed by the 1Ds MkII.
Canon explicitly marketed the 1D X as the tenth in the series of the EOS 1 line. That included film cameras. Seems odd to me that they would amalgamate the line and explicitly label it the tenth EOS 1, then again change the naming scheme and use 1D X Mark II...the second tenth iteration? Strange.
Not wrong:
The new model launches as the flagship in Canon’s DSLR line up – marking the 10th generation of Canon’s professional system with the most advanced EOS model ever produced.
source:
http://www.canon.co.uk/about_us/press_centre/press_releases/consumer_news/cameras_accessories/eos-1_dx.aspx
an0nymes said:Is one logical way, if you count in this way 10th generation is possible:
1/ EOS-1 (1989)
2/ EOS-1N and 1N HS (1994)
3/ EOS-1NRS (1995)
4/ EOS-1V and 1V HS (2000)
5/ EOS-1D (2001) and EOS-1Ds (2002)
6/ EOS-1D MkII (2004) and EOS-1Ds MkII (2004
7/ EOS-1D MkIIn (2005)
8/ EOS-1D MkIII (2007) and EOS-1Ds MkIII (2007)
9/ EOS-1D MkIV (2009)
10/ EOS-1DX (2012) and EOS-1DC (2012)
privatebydesign said:an0nymes said:Is one logical way, if you count in this way 10th generation is possible:
1/ EOS-1 (1989)
2/ EOS-1N and 1N HS (1994)
3/ EOS-1NRS (1995)
4/ EOS-1V and 1V HS (2000)
5/ EOS-1D (2001) and EOS-1Ds (2002)
6/ EOS-1D MkII (2004) and EOS-1Ds MkII (2004
7/ EOS-1D MkIIn (2005)
8/ EOS-1D MkIII (2007) and EOS-1Ds MkIII (2007)
9/ EOS-1D MkIV (2009)
10/ EOS-1DX (2012) and EOS-1DC (2012)
But what is the justification, or sense, in dropping three 1Ds's and including the 1NRS?
tpatana said:privatebydesign said:an0nymes said:Is one logical way, if you count in this way 10th generation is possible:
1/ EOS-1 (1989)
2/ EOS-1N and 1N HS (1994)
3/ EOS-1NRS (1995)
4/ EOS-1V and 1V HS (2000)
5/ EOS-1D (2001) and EOS-1Ds (2002)
6/ EOS-1D MkII (2004) and EOS-1Ds MkII (2004
7/ EOS-1D MkIIn (2005)
8/ EOS-1D MkIII (2007) and EOS-1Ds MkIII (2007)
9/ EOS-1D MkIV (2009)
10/ EOS-1DX (2012) and EOS-1DC (2012)
But what is the justification, or sense, in dropping three 1Ds's and including the 1NRS?
To make it match the 10th.
It all went like this:
1: Marketing guys thought X sounds cool
2: Marketing guys told other people it needs to be the tenth version
3: It was sold as the tenth
Maybe we will see it at 3000 but however at 4599.99 I had to take advantage of that...and now I'm finally a proud owner!!!!Hjalmarg1 said:Yeah, I am eager to see the price of current 1Dx coming down to US$3,000helpful said:Thank you so much. All you do related to rumors, especially in regards to the 1D X Mark II and other flagship bodies, is invaluable in helping me make decisions throughout the years as I strategically transition from previous generation cameras.