AvTvM said:certainly a "mere coincidence" that ISO100-400 sample pics are available, while ISO800 and above are only "coming soon".
Seeing this, I take it for granted, that the "new" 6D sensor also sucks, at least compared to Nikon/Sony. Probably no improvement at all in DR, noise, banding compared to 5D 2 and 3.
plam_1980 said:
plam_1980 said:
nicku said:plam_1980 said:
from my point of view .... Nikon wins..... the last stronghold that canon my have in the ''war'' with D600 is destroyed.
As a 7D user that wants to upgrade to FF i am left with 2 choices: 5D3 or Nikon. more appealing at this moment is Nikon.
Noink Fanb0i said:Well, I can say that Image 5 (Portrait at ISO 200) is a definite win. I rate it at 10/10.![]()
nicku said:Noink Fanb0i said:Well, I can say that Image 5 (Portrait at ISO 200) is a definite win. I rate it at 10/10.![]()
if you rate that portrait at 10/10 how you rate this one (made with Nikon D600):
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
12 out of ten????
from the first samples available ( Canon 6D and Nikon D600 ) Nikon CLEARLY wins.
I am a Canon fun and use Canon gear from many years... but i must admit... in this days Nikon is better.
Man, that Nikon shot is WAY sharper than the Canon 6D. I've been a Canon fan for years but Nikon is winning me over. I'd never buy the 6D over the D600 but the 5DIII is still compelling. When it comes to straight picture quality though, Nikon is winning all over the place. Not sure whether to switch to Nikon with the D600 or D800 or to update my 7D to the 5DIII. The 6D is worthless to me. The best combination though is a 5DIII with a D800. The 5DIII for the low light and run & gun style shooting with the D800 and a nice sharp lens for landscapes and portraits. Of course, the D4 is even better for low light & run & gun shooting so you could go all Nikonnicku said:if you rate that portrait at 10/10 how you rate this one (made with Nikon D600):
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
12 out of ten????
dswatson83 said:Man, that Nikon shot is WAY sharper than the Canon 6D. I've been a Canon fan for years but Nikon is winning me over. I'd never buy the 6D over the D600 but the 5DIII is still compelling. When it comes to straight picture quality though, Nikon is winning all over the place. Not sure whether to switch to Nikon with the D600 or D800 or to update my 7D to the 5DIII. The 6D is worthless to me. The best combination though is a 5DIII with a D800. The 5DIII for the low light and run & gun style shooting with the D800 and a nice sharp lens for landscapes and portraits. Of course, the D4 is even better for low light & run & gun shooting so you could go all Nikonnicku said:if you rate that portrait at 10/10 how you rate this one (made with Nikon D600):
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
12 out of ten????
chadders said:nicku said:Noink Fanb0i said:Well, I can say that Image 5 (Portrait at ISO 200) is a definite win. I rate it at 10/10.![]()
if you rate that portrait at 10/10 how you rate this one (made with Nikon D600):
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
12 out of ten????
from the first samples available ( Canon 6D and Nikon D600 ) Nikon CLEARLY wins.
I am a Canon fun and use Canon gear from many years... but i must admit... in this days Nikon is better.
My personal preference is to see all the face in focus.
DB said:plam_1980 said:
Stop comparing a photographic camera (Nikon) with a video DSLR (6D). There's no comparison.
nicku said:plam_1980 said:
from my point of view .... Nikon wins..... the last stronghold that canon my have in the ''war'' with D600 is destroyed.
As a 7D user that wants to upgrade to FF i am left with 2 choices: 5D3 or Nikon. more appealing at this moment is Nikon.
Nikon wins??? Look at the Canon 6D video shot in a dimly lit cave @ ISO = 12800. Canon has won the video DSLR battle again....just as they did 4 years ago with the 5D mark II
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
Gothmoth said:http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
i would love the 6D samples had this kind of sharpness.
but i guess it does not matter als long as you can upload 500pixel images via wifi.....
ps: personaly i say - F U K video.. but that is only my opinion.
Wow, the portrait shot from D600 is way sharper than 6D's.nicku said:Noink Fanb0i said:Well, I can say that Image 5 (Portrait at ISO 200) is a definite win. I rate it at 10/10.![]()
if you rate that portrait at 10/10 how you rate this one (made with Nikon D600):
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
12 out of ten????
from the first samples available ( Canon 6D and Nikon D600 ) Nikon CLEARLY wins.
I am a Canon fun and use Canon gear from many years... but i must admit... in this days Nikon is better.
nicku said:Noink Fanb0i said:Well, I can say that Image 5 (Portrait at ISO 200) is a definite win. I rate it at 10/10.![]()
if you rate that portrait at 10/10 how you rate this one (made with Nikon D600):
http://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d600/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg
12 out of ten????
from the first samples available ( Canon 6D and Nikon D600 ) Nikon CLEARLY wins.
I am a Canon fun and use Canon gear from many years... but i must admit... in this days Nikon is better.