Eos-R Sensor measurements posted by Photonstophoto.

AlanF

Desperately seeking birds
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
12,441
22,878
Thanks for the heads up. I had missed it because it is the Read Noise only so far and not the Dynamic Range yet. The noise is basically the same as the 5DIV sensor, and worse than the Sony A7III and A7R3 - http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_ADU.htm#Canon EOS 5D Mark IV_14,Canon EOS R_14,Sony ILCE-7M3_14,Sony ILCE-7RM3_14
Interestingly, the noise is very similar to that of the Nikon Z7 at higher isos, where they are both worse than Sony, but Nikon pulls very slightly ahead at base iso http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_ADU.htm#Canon EOS R_14,Nikon Z 7_14(p),Sony ILCE-7M3_14

It looks like Sony hasn't given Nikon access to their best sensors and is attempting to retain an edge, as alluded to in another thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

LSXPhotog

Automotive, Commercial, & Motorsports
CR Pro
Apr 2, 2015
789
984
Tampa, FL
www.diossiphotography.com
Upvote 0

LSXPhotog

Automotive, Commercial, & Motorsports
CR Pro
Apr 2, 2015
789
984
Tampa, FL
www.diossiphotography.com
Interesting to me that they have these results and can't even open a RAW file. What a load of garbage to fuel the internet.
Also, comparing the A7R III and Z7 ($3200+) versus at $2300 camera. Let's wait and see what Canon has for us in the $3200 price range. LOL
 
Upvote 0

AlanF

Desperately seeking birds
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
12,441
22,878
Interesting to me that they have these results and can't even open a RAW file. What a load of garbage to fuel the internet.
Interesting to me that they have these results and can't even open a RAW file. What a load of garbage to fuel the internet.
Don't say that about Bill Claff of photonstophotos. He has shown time after time that he can get preliminary data out that are very close to his more extensive later analyses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0