Except that this website cites their sources if it's picked from the internet, which it usually is because it's not very good...Mt Spokane Photography said:They likely read the CR post a couple of weeks ago. These places pick up rumors and repeat / modify them so that you never know exactly where they started.
http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/09/the-next-eos-m-cr2/
mountain_drew said:Except that this website cites their sources if it's picked from the internet, which it usually is because it's not very good...
Lichtgestalt said:mountain_drew said:Except that this website cites their sources if it's picked from the internet, which it usually is because it's not very good...
excuse my bad english... but what do you want to say?
Thanks for trying but that's not what I meant. Canonwatch rarely publishes anything new, it's usually a report of some other website or some deals (I assume it's a profitable gimmick). I posted to specify that Canonwatch specifies their sources, so it's not hard to find where the rumor is actually from.Mt Spokane Photography said:Lichtgestalt said:mountain_drew said:Except that this website cites their sources if it's picked from the internet, which it usually is because it's not very good...
excuse my bad english... but what do you want to say?
He is saying this website is not very good, but still is posting here. He posts something that really is not answering the question, or is useful... to set a example??
He is saying this website is not very good, but still is posting here. He posts something that really is not answering the question, or is useful... to set a example??
Lichtgestalt said:He is saying this website is not very good, but still is posting here. He posts something that really is not answering the question, or is useful... to set a example??
so in short he complains that on a RUMOR site not every news make it to reality?
ah... i see.![]()
mountain_drew said:Thanks for trying but that's not what I meant. Canonwatch rarely publishes anything new, it's usually a report of some other website or some deals (I assume it's a profitable gimmick). I posted to specify that Canonwatch specifies their sources, so it's not hard to find where the rumor is actually from.Mt Spokane Photography said:Lichtgestalt said:mountain_drew said:Except that this website cites their sources if it's picked from the internet, which it usually is because it's not very good...
excuse my bad english... but what do you want to say?
He is saying this website is not very good, but still is posting here. He posts something that really is not answering the question, or is useful... to set a example??
Mt Spokane Photography said:Lichtgestalt said:mountain_drew said:Except that this website cites their sources if it's picked from the internet, which it usually is because it's not very good...
excuse my bad english... but what do you want to say?
He is saying this website is not very good, but still is posting here. He posts something that really is not answering the question, or is useful... to set a example??
Ignore my misunderstanding