Hahaha, I would hate being so obsessed with cameras that instead of taking images I sat on a computer looking at how it compares to something else all day like they do.
somebody better shoot some resolution test charts, and properly, cuz this real-life nonsense if full of ambiguity.
FWIW, one of the reasons I shoot fuji gear is I can get OOC jpgs good to go with no or little post.
Saves me futzin' about on the 'puter. Gettin' old, don't have time to waste.
Perhaps that's a good marketing slogan for mirrorless,
Get it right, in camera, cuz at your age you can't risk unfinished business because you died during post.."
So if the lens on the X-T2 is very good, theoretically, it can out resolve the 5DSR, but practically, I don't think you'll see any difference... it'll depend on lens, shooting condition and image processing method.
Anyway, from the images the website provided, I don't see any significant difference.
This is probably like the time Tony claimed the 70-200ii with a 2X converter was significantly sharper than the 100-400ii with both at 400mm. The man has track record of making bizarre claims.
He and Chelsea seem to be far too occupied with their cameras to start one
Actually this type of thing isn't new; it may have been the same site who demonstrated that the Pentax K3 produced sharper images than the Nikon D600. Print it big, then you'll see the real story.
Actually this type of thing isn't new; it may have been the same site who demonstrated that the Pentax K3 produced sharper images than the Nikon D600. Print it big, then you'll see the real story.