Get the 1DX or wait for the 7D Mark II?!

[retina]

I wonder when the "I can't decide between 1DX and 700D/Rebel T5i" thread will show up!

 

[MonteGraham]

I wonder when the "I can't decide between 1DX and 700D/Rebel T5i" thread will show up!

+2

 

[thfifthcrouch]

I wonder when the "I can't decide between 1DX and 700D/Rebel T5i" thread will show up!

+2

Pretty darn funny! This is the major leagues of gear!

 

[DaveMiko]

Hi again everybody,

By reading and re-reading all your thoughts and comments, I guess I have a clearer picture in my mind now. The only thing that made me consider the (rumoured) 7D Mark II is the fact that, being it a crop sensor, it might give me more reach, but then I will have to compromise, somehow, on IQ. The 1DX has got it all, so I guess I'll go for it. Also, I think I'll get rid of the 7D, since I rarely use it now (only in bright, sunny days) and, moreover, I don't need 3 cameras.

Dave, congratulations on your decision! I think you made the very best choice! Also, I think once you start shooting with your new 1DX, you'll be surprised how much reach you're not needing, the AF and the IQ being so much better than your 7D, you'll be able to very easily crop for your extra reach without any issues in quality degradation.

Also, be careful, seems like lot's of 1DX owners get some sort of itch for 500mm - 800mm L glass!

Congratulations again on your decision, I'm looking forward to seeing your 1DX images!!

All the best! 8)

Thanks Krob. I guess, my 5D Mark III will see less and less use, too. ... Hahahahahah ... Well, to be honest, ever since I purchased my first L glass (the 70-200 f4), I've developed a serious case of "L" addiction.

I always reach out for my 1dx over the 5d3 for most things. Enjoy!

8)

Hi again everybody,

By reading and re-reading all your thoughts and comments, I guess I have a clearer picture in my mind now. The only thing that made me consider the (rumoured) 7D Mark II is the fact that, being it a crop sensor, it might give me more reach, but then I will have to compromise, somehow, on IQ. The 1DX has got it all, so I guess I'll go for it. Also, I think I'll get rid of the 7D, since I rarely use it now (only in bright, sunny days) and, moreover, I don't need 3 cameras.

Good decision! You'll love the 1Dx. I've rented it a few times and it's a beast of a camera! (I mean that in a good way)

8)

 

[ajfotofilmagem]

I wonder when the "I can't decide between 1DX and 700D/Rebel T5i" thread will show up!

When I win the lottery, make this question. So I decide to go shooting for work or just for fun. 8)

 

[Niki]

it took me a while to save up for my 5d mark iii…so while I was waiting I bought a canon film camera…it was the best thing I ever did…stunning images…and now I use my film camera just as much as I use my digital camera

 

[WPJ]

Rent one and find out, I just found out I can get a 1DX for 125 for a weekend. The camera places around here want 375 for a weekend, thank you cps..

 

[Dylan777]

Go for 1D X and forget about 7D II. It will be miles diff. between these two. My trusted source said that

 

[DaveMiko]

Go for 1D X and forget about 7D II. It will be miles diff. between these two. My trusted source said that

Thanks for the tip. I have already made my decision, in favour of the mighty 1DX. 8)

 

[eml58]

You mentioned portrait and landscape....for these uses, your 5d3 would be a better camera than the 7d2...and comparable to a 1dx. IMO

Good advice, if all your intended use is Portrait & Landscape I don't think the 1Dx brings a lot to the Party, well, it brings a lot, it just may not be useful.

If your intention is to shoot a reasonable amount of action/wildlife/sports, then the 1Dx is the way to go.

If you don't mind carrying a Brick, go 1Dx, if you like to shoot in all weather conditions without using a Condom on your Camera, go 1Dx, if you want the ability to spot focus on any focus point, go 1Dx.

The IQ between the 1Dx & 5DMK III I feel is pretty well the same, it's becomes about, cost & use.

If cost isn't an issue and you don't mind carrying the extra weight, then it's no contest, 1Dx.

You might think about the Sony a7r, I imagine this Camera will be a reasonable Landscape/Portrait Body, you can use your Canon Lenses etc, lighter than either the 1Dx or the 5DMK III, but it's not a Canon so may not get too many votes in this Forum, but Sony make good gear and this Camera may work well, this is conjecture on my part, I don't own one, yet.

 

[DaveMiko]

You mentioned portrait and landscape....for these uses, your 5d3 would be a better camera than the 7d2...and comparable to a 1dx. IMO

Good advice, if all your intended use is Portrait & Landscape I don't think the 1Dx brings a lot to the Party, well, it brings a lot, it just may not be useful.

If your intention is to shoot a reasonable amount of action/wildlife/sports, then the 1Dx is the way to go.

If you don't mind carrying a Brick, go 1Dx, if you like to shoot in all weather conditions without using a Condom on your Camera, go 1Dx, if you want the ability to spot focus on any focus point, go 1Dx.

The IQ between the 1Dx & 5DMK III I feel is pretty well the same, it's becomes about, cost & use.

If cost isn't an issue and you don't mind carrying the extra weight, then it's no contest, 1Dx.

You might think about the Sony a7r, I imagine this Camera will be a reasonable Landscape/Portrait Body, you can use your Canon Lenses etc, lighter than either the 1Dx or the 5DMK III, but it's not a Canon so may not get too many votes in this Forum, but Sony make good gear and this Camera may work well, this is conjecture on my part, I don't own one, yet.

8)

 

[M.ST]

The preseries 7D Mark II works very well, but you can´t compare it with the 1D X.

You can shoot landscapes with the 7D Mark II and the 1D X, but none of them is really the best choice for landscapes and portraits.

If you want to shoot most images in the range Action, Sports, Wildlife etc. and only at times some portraits and landscapes get the 1D X.

If you want to shoot most images in the range landscape, portraits und a times sports, action and wildlife and want have a pro body wait for the outstanding new 1 S (or whatever called). The new camera is a beast with an outstanding IQ in combination with an perfect AF-System. But you have to pay a lot of bucks more for it.

Remember:
You can´t shoot today with an upcoming camera. If you need the camera now, get the 1D X or the 5D Mark III and and switch to the 1 S if the camera hit the market.

 

[DaveMiko]

The preseries 7D Mark II works very well, but you can´t compare it with the 1D X.

You can shoot landscapes with the 7D Mark II and the 1D X, but none of them is really the best choice for landscapes and portraits.

If you want to shoot most images in the range Action, Sports, Wildlife etc. and only at times some portraits and landscapes get the 1D X.

If you want to shoot most images in the range landscape, portraits und a times sports, action and wildlife and want have a pro body wait for the outstanding new 1 S (or whatever called). The new camera is a beast with an outstanding IQ in combination with an perfect AF-System. But you have to pay a lot of bucks more for it.

Remember:
You can´t shoot today with an upcoming camera. If you need the camera now, get the 1D X or the 5D Mark III and and switch to the 1 S if the camera hit the market.

+1 Thanks for your thoughts. ... I already own a 7D and a 5D Mark III. I decided to get the 1DX now and get rid of the 7D (I've already put it up for sale). ... I'll have fun with the 1DX for a while and then I'll take a good look at the new upcoming Canon flagship.

 

[TrabimanUK]

What about a 1D IV? 1.3x crop, better IQ than a 7D, 10fps.

OK, not as good as the mighty 1Dx, but you'll save a lot of pennies and do you really need a super-pro level camera, or could you get away with a good-pro camera if you're not a full-on pro?

 

[DaveMiko]

What about a 1D IV? 1.3x crop, better IQ than a 7D, 10fps.

OK, not as good as the mighty 1Dx, but you'll save a lot of pennies and do you really need a super-pro level camera, or could you get away with a good-pro camera if you're not a full-on pro?

I don't really need any camera, since I only shoot for the fun of it. I guess, many others are in my predicament. 8) ... That being said, if I decide to get a piece of machinery as complex and sophisticated as a DSLR I only want the best I can get and that is the mighty Canon 1DX.
The 1D Mark IV is not up-to-date and, as you mentioned, not as good as the mighty 1DX, that's the problem with it.

 

[Northstar]

What about a 1D IV? 1.3x crop, better IQ than a 7D, 10fps.

OK, not as good as the mighty 1Dx, but you'll save a lot of pennies and do you really need a super-pro level camera, or could you get away with a good-pro camera if you're not a full-on pro?

I don't really need any camera, since I only shoot for the fun of it. I guess, many others are in my predicament. 8) ... That being said, if I decide to get a piece of machinery as complex and sophisticated as a DSLR I only want the best I can get and that is the mighty Canon 1DX.
The 1D Mark IV is not up-to-date and, as you mentioned, not as good as the mighty 1DX, that's the problem with it.

As I said before, the 1dx is brilliant at capturing fast moving action and it's great in low light...if that's what you'll use it for then go for it, if not, then stick with the 5d3 and buy more glass with $6500... The newest 300 2.8 is the same price. :

 

[DaveMiko]

What about a 1D IV? 1.3x crop, better IQ than a 7D, 10fps.

OK, not as good as the mighty 1Dx, but you'll save a lot of pennies and do you really need a super-pro level camera, or could you get away with a good-pro camera if you're not a full-on pro?

I don't really need any camera, since I only shoot for the fun of it. I guess, many others are in my predicament. 8) ... That being said, if I decide to get a piece of machinery as complex and sophisticated as a DSLR I only want the best I can get and that is the mighty Canon 1DX.
The 1D Mark IV is not up-to-date and, as you mentioned, not as good as the mighty 1DX, that's the problem with it.

As I said before, the 1dx is brilliant at capturing fast moving action and it's great in low light...if that's what you'll use it for then go for it, if not, then stick with the 5d3 and buy more glass with $6500... The newest 300 2.8 is the same price. :

That's a good idea. I like that. 8)

 

[Northstar]

What about a 1D IV? 1.3x crop, better IQ than a 7D, 10fps.

OK, not as good as the mighty 1Dx, but you'll save a lot of pennies and do you really need a super-pro level camera, or could you get away with a good-pro camera if you're not a full-on pro?

I don't really need any camera, since I only shoot for the fun of it. I guess, many others are in my predicament. 8) ... That being said, if I decide to get a piece of machinery as complex and sophisticated as a DSLR I only want the best I can get and that is the mighty Canon 1DX.
The 1D Mark IV is not up-to-date and, as you mentioned, not as good as the mighty 1DX, that's the problem with it.

As I said before, the 1dx is brilliant at capturing fast moving action and it's great in low light...if that's what you'll use it for then go for it, if not, then stick with the 5d3 and buy more glass with $6500... The newest 300 2.8 is the same price. :

That's a good idea. I like that. 8)

Of course you would, it's only the best glass made by canon ever. Decisions decisions....

 

[DaveMiko]

What about a 1D IV? 1.3x crop, better IQ than a 7D, 10fps.

OK, not as good as the mighty 1Dx, but you'll save a lot of pennies and do you really need a super-pro level camera, or could you get away with a good-pro camera if you're not a full-on pro?

I don't really need any camera, since I only shoot for the fun of it. I guess, many others are in my predicament. 8) ... That being said, if I decide to get a piece of machinery as complex and sophisticated as a DSLR I only want the best I can get and that is the mighty Canon 1DX.
The 1D Mark IV is not up-to-date and, as you mentioned, not as good as the mighty 1DX, that's the problem with it.

As I said before, the 1dx is brilliant at capturing fast moving action and it's great in low light...if that's what you'll use it for then go for it, if not, then stick with the 5d3 and buy more glass with $6500... The newest 300 2.8 is the same price. :

That's a good idea. I like that. 8)

Of course you would, it's only the best glass made by canon ever. Decisions decisions....

??? :