johnf3f said:
A 600 f/4do is still going to have a 150mm front, and just as many elements as the regular 600. It would likely cost substantially more as well. It would be shorter but that is the only real benefit.
Upvote
0
Getting Canon 200-400 f4 L this weekend...advice?
- Thread starter PureClassA
- Start date
A 600 f/4do is still going to have a 150mm front, and just as many elements as the regular 600. It would likely cost substantially more as well. It would be shorter but that is the only real benefit.
Ok....... it's over.... I'm nearly blind in both eyes from staring through the OVF for 3 hours at a time.... 4 shows. 160 dance number.... 12,000 frames shot. Apart from the lower lighting than a camera would like, we have Fresnels, Leicos, LEDs, and a huge 12 foot tall, 30 foot wide solid LED wall all at different color temps.... yeah.
It's the one of the most challenging things I can image as a photographer, but it's always fun. I haven't even really looked at the RAW files yet closely, but what I have seen looks pretty good.
Auto ISO (much less AUTO anything) was still a no-go this year. There is still waaaaaaay to many lighting schemes on stage (and a fog machine to create the light beam effects) that wrecks hell on a metering system. Full manual with dialing on the fly as needed worked much better.
It's the one of the most challenging things I can image as a photographer, but it's always fun. I haven't even really looked at the RAW files yet closely, but what I have seen looks pretty good.
Auto ISO (much less AUTO anything) was still a no-go this year. There is still waaaaaaay to many lighting schemes on stage (and a fog machine to create the light beam effects) that wrecks hell on a metering system. Full manual with dialing on the fly as needed worked much better.
Upvote
0
Wish I could explain how utterly ridiculous it was to trap dancers moving at Mach 2 with at least 1/500th a second with all that crap going on! ISO 6400 all the way.
Jim Saunders said:
Upvote
0
