• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Going to Italy - 70-200 or 100-400?

I ended up by bringing the 11-24, 24-70 II, and 100-400 II.

I’m still here in Florence and Rome for another week. I don’t regret my lens choices. All of them have come in extremely handy.

Thanks for everyone’s input.
 
Upvote 0
I was just in Venice! Personally, I think you are wasting your space in the bag bringing a telephoto lens to Venice. There were not too many opportunities I discovered where I personally wanted anything more than a 24-105. I took a few shots with a 16-35 (it was actually the Tamron 17-35) but no need for reach. The city is very small and has narrow lines of sight unless you're on a boat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I was just in Venice! Personally, I think you are wasting your space in the bag bringing a telephoto lens to Venice. There were not too many opportunities I discovered where I personally wanted anything more than a 24-105. I took a few shots with a 16-35 (it was actually the Tamron 17-35) but no need for reach. The city is very small and has narrow lines of sight unless you're on a boat.


I hope you had a nice time. We were there during the awful flooding. The first day of the flooding it was kind of interesting, but the second day sucked -- everything was closed down, and it was hard to find food. I felt bad for the Venetians, but I think they are used to flooding ;) Fortunately for us the weather improved the next couple of days were were there.

I actually used the 100-400 quite a bit in Venice. I focused in on small detail areas and from the top the Bell Tower immediately across from St. Mark's Square.

I also used the 11-24 a lot too, as well as the 24-70. I found uses for all of them, and I'm glad I brought all three lenses despite the extra weight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0