This should conclude my novice-like posts. I use the 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 (on my 70D) for sports and can't say enough about that combo (especially for indoors and might eventually get some sort of telephoto zoom for outdoors).
My 35 2.0 IS does most everything else and does it well, but I might like to broaden my horizons with something wider for landscapes. Would you say that the 10-22 would nicely complement a 35 (on a crop of course)? Also considering the 24 2.8 IS and am also considering nothing.
Thanks again for all of the shared knowledge and experience.
My 35 2.0 IS does most everything else and does it well, but I might like to broaden my horizons with something wider for landscapes. Would you say that the 10-22 would nicely complement a 35 (on a crop of course)? Also considering the 24 2.8 IS and am also considering nothing.
Thanks again for all of the shared knowledge and experience.