Good Non-Sports Mix - 10-22 + 35 2.0 IS?

This should conclude my novice-like posts. I use the 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 (on my 70D) for sports and can't say enough about that combo (especially for indoors and might eventually get some sort of telephoto zoom for outdoors).
My 35 2.0 IS does most everything else and does it well, but I might like to broaden my horizons with something wider for landscapes. Would you say that the 10-22 would nicely complement a 35 (on a crop of course)? Also considering the 24 2.8 IS and am also considering nothing.
Thanks again for all of the shared knowledge and experience.
 
Random Orbits said:
My vote is for the 10-22. 24mm is somewhat limiting on crop -- it is much better suited for FF.
I agree. I have the 28mm f/2.8 IS USM and the 10-22. I really like my 28mm and it's nice for walking around town, but it isn't that wide on crop. The 10-22 works great when I want to capture more of the surroundings. Here is an example of a scene shot at 10mm with a T3i.

It has also come in handy at crowded car shows and in other situations where there isn't room to take a few steps back to fit everything in the frame. Do note that you will get vignetting at the wide end if you stack filters on the 10-22.
 
Upvote 0
I own a 10-22, it's very useful at times. That particular filter should be fine, I have a hoya digital (something I've forgot) on my lens, I think any slim line filter should be perfectly fine. Only if stacking numerous filters, as in the case of many lenses, you may vignette.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
you should also have a good look at the new version tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Personally i'd go with this as having a fast aperture wide angle can be very usefull for things other than landscapes

I think on a 70D i would go with
tokina 11-16 f2.8 for wide
sigma 18-35 f1.8 for normal

wait for the new 50mm with is from canon or the new sigma 50mm

and you already have good glass at the longer end
 
Upvote 0