GuyF, I think they could be right. From that French review I've downloaded some raw files of test charts which they also shot with the D5.
At 3200 and 6400 they seem (to my eyes) about equal in noise performance. At 12.800 and 25.600 the D5 seems to have an advantage of about 1/2 a stop.
Now, the D5 does have a better dynamic range at 6400 and above. At 3200 the files can be pushed equally as well; but below that, the 1DX II did better (much better in fact; at iso 100 you can throw shadows around as you wish without much punishment).
So, it seems Nikon made a high iso monster, whereas Canon has made a more all-round camera.
At 3200 and 6400 they seem (to my eyes) about equal in noise performance. At 12.800 and 25.600 the D5 seems to have an advantage of about 1/2 a stop.
Now, the D5 does have a better dynamic range at 6400 and above. At 3200 the files can be pushed equally as well; but below that, the 1DX II did better (much better in fact; at iso 100 you can throw shadows around as you wish without much punishment).
So, it seems Nikon made a high iso monster, whereas Canon has made a more all-round camera.
Upvote
0