Very interesting webinar from B&H live now.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/promotion/11107/canon-eos-5dsr-live-panel.html
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/promotion/11107/canon-eos-5dsr-live-panel.html
JohnUSA said:If shooting with Canon is good enough for Gregory Heisler, Canon is good enough for me!
He's been one of my favorite photographers for a long time. He's done lots of innovative and creative in-camera effects before Photoshop became popular. I don't think he's the kind of person that can be bought by a camera company... he does tons of camera and lens testing and he'll shoot with what works the best for him. So I value his opinion more than most! I just wish Canon consulted with him during the whole development process!
I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
TheJock said:I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
Sporgon said:TheJock said:I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
I think that finding it is not a MF camera is inescapable.
However toni999 forgot to mention that we can stitch and get MF quality for one tenth of the price
OK , maybe not for portrait, but for what I do I'm happy !
meywd said:Sporgon said:TheJock said:I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
I think that finding it is not a MF camera is inescapable.
However toni999 forgot to mention that we can stitch and get MF quality for one tenth of the price
OK , maybe not for portrait, but for what I do I'm happy !
You can pano portraits.
Sporgon said:meywd said:Sporgon said:TheJock said:I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
I think that finding it is not a MF camera is inescapable.
However toni999 forgot to mention that we can stitch and get MF quality for one tenth of the price
OK , maybe not for portrait, but for what I do I'm happy !
You can pano portraits.
I know, but you have to draw the line somewhere !
I find it mostly impractical.
meywd said:Sporgon said:meywd said:Sporgon said:TheJock said:I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
I think that finding it is not a MF camera is inescapable.
However toni999 forgot to mention that we can stitch and get MF quality for one tenth of the price
OK , maybe not for portrait, but for what I do I'm happy !
You can pano portraits.
I know, but you have to draw the line somewhere !
I find it mostly impractical.
yeah, but I like the results.
Sporgon said:meywd said:Sporgon said:meywd said:Sporgon said:TheJock said:I’m sorry mate, but comparing a $14,000 camera to a new $3,800 camera is completely irrelevant, and frankly reeks of showing off that you own the former, it's like saying a Ferrari is better than the new Honda Civic, pointless!toni999 said:I own the 5dsr, and I own a Hasselblad H4d-40.
The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
I keep updating my review here:
http://www.valentino-photography.com/photography-reviews/canon-5dsr/
I think that finding it is not a MF camera is inescapable.
However toni999 forgot to mention that we can stitch and get MF quality for one tenth of the price
OK , maybe not for portrait, but for what I do I'm happy !
You can pano portraits.
I know, but you have to draw the line somewhere !
I find it mostly impractical.
yeah, but I like the results.
And there you have it: MF quality for one tenth of the price![]()
toni999 said:The results with the 24-70mm L II F2.8 are not even close to what I get from my Hasselblad.
Trying to get better lenses now...hhmmm but wait, the new 24-70 f2.8 is supposed to be the best. The 50L was crap.
Maybe the Sigmas would do, but I'm not sure about color and AF on them.
Yes, Heisler's work speaks for itself, but I really wonder about some of the interactions in this video. I assume he was just playing devils advocate with some of the "questions he's always had". I mean surely he has access to google. He did bring up some good points and provide a different perspective that I hadn't thought of before so it was valuable having him there.privatebydesign said:JohnUSA said:If shooting with Canon is good enough for Gregory Heisler, Canon is good enough for me!
He's been one of my favorite photographers for a long time. He's done lots of innovative and creative in-camera effects before Photoshop became popular. I don't think he's the kind of person that can be bought by a camera company... he does tons of camera and lens testing and he'll shoot with what works the best for him. So I value his opinion more than most! I just wish Canon consulted with him during the whole development process!
Absolutely agree, and it was why I mentioned the link, I know there was one posted previously but I thought a timely reminder was relevant.
Heisler is a true Master, I have his book '50 Portraits' and it is very thought provoking in the way he approaches a commission. He knows his equipment, he knows what it will do for him and he will only use what he wants. He has a humility that is wonderful and genuine, his saying even he bought his Hasselblad back used was an eye opener! And, he said several times, if he could only have one camera it would be the 5D MkIII, now that is high praise.