Have you preordered an RF 200-800mm?

Have you preordered a 200-800mm?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
So I have done some tests indoors. First set @ ~6.2m with 100-400, 100-500 & 200-800 with and without 1.4 which is about the distance where the 12inch/30cm test card fills the sensor at around 700-800mm. Also a second set around 11.3m from target a bit more typical of my use. not happy with a couple of these shots but the 100-500+1.4 v 200-800 is a win for the 200-800 which is perhaps expected but good to confirm. Posts coming up
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
@ 6.2m / 20 feet Part 1
 

Attachments

  • 100-400 400 F8 9U1A8760x.jpg
    100-400 400 F8 9U1A8760x.jpg
    954.7 KB · Views: 7
  • 100-400 400 F9 9U1A8764x.jpg
    100-400 400 F9 9U1A8764x.jpg
    968.5 KB · Views: 7
  • 100-400 400 F11 9U1A8743x.jpg
    100-400 400 F11 9U1A8743x.jpg
    870.2 KB · Views: 7
  • 100-500 500 F7.1 9U1A8746x.jpg
    100-500 500 F7.1 9U1A8746x.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 7
  • 100-500 500 F8 9U1A8749x.jpg
    100-500 500 F8 9U1A8749x.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 7
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
@6.2m Part 2
 

Attachments

  • 100-400+1.4 560 F11 9U1A8740x.jpg
    100-400+1.4 560 F11 9U1A8740x.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 8
  • 100-500+1.4 700 F11 9U1A8757x.jpg
    100-500+1.4 700 F11 9U1A8757x.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 7
  • 200-800 707 F9 9U1A8771x.jpg
    200-800 707 F9 9U1A8771x.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 8
  • 200-800 800 F9 9U1A8773x.jpg
    200-800 800 F9 9U1A8773x.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 7
  • 200-800 1120 F13 9U1A8737x.jpg
    200-800 1120 F13 9U1A8737x.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 7
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
@ 11.3m / 37 feet
 

Attachments

  • 100-400 400 F8 Long 9U1A8794x.jpg
    100-400 400 F8 Long 9U1A8794x.jpg
    328.4 KB · Views: 6
  • 100-500 500 F7.1 Long 9U1A8785x.jpg
    100-500 500 F7.1 Long 9U1A8785x.jpg
    500.7 KB · Views: 7
  • 100-500 700 F10 Long 9U1A8811x.jpg
    100-500 700 F10 Long 9U1A8811x.jpg
    800.6 KB · Views: 9
  • 200-800 800 F9 Long 9U1A8814x.jpg
    200-800 800 F9 Long 9U1A8814x.jpg
    993.9 KB · Views: 10
  • 200-800 1120 F13 Long 9U1A8803x.jpg
    200-800 1120 F13 Long 9U1A8803x.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 10
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
So I have done some tests indoors. First set @ ~6.2m with 100-400, 100-500 & 200-800 with and without 1.4 which is about the distance where the 12inch/30cm test card fills the sensor at around 700-800mm. Also a second set around 11.3m from target a bit more typical of my use. not happy with a couple of these shots but the 100-500+1.4 v 200-800 is a win for the 200-800 which is perhaps expected but good to confirm. Posts coming up
Thank you so much for doing these - greatly appreciated. I have looked at these very carefully. For groups 1 and 2, did you adjust the distance so they all filled the same size on the sensor or did you upscale the smaller ones to be the same size?

My favourite charts are those that have circles of closely spaced fine lines or finely spaced close parallel lines at different separations so you can see when they can no longer be resolved. I have made a collage of the smallest circles from group 3 at 11.3m as they are closest to fine spacing, and it is quite informative. You can see that the 400mm is just able to resolve the lines, but the rest are well resolved. They also detect some shake or shutter shock when the 1.4xTC is attached, and this is making the 500mm at 700mm look worse. You can see it also see the horizontal shake at 700mm where the vertical lines are much worse than the horizontal elsewhere. I don't think it is astigmatism of the TC as the apparent shake is in a different direction when on the 800mm.

Small_Rings.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
So I have done some tests indoors. First set @ ~6.2m with 100-400, 100-500 & 200-800 with and without 1.4 which is about the distance where the 12inch/30cm test card fills the sensor at around 700-800mm. Also a second set around 11.3m from target a bit more typical of my use. not happy with a couple of these shots but the 100-500+1.4 v 200-800 is a win for the 200-800 which is perhaps expected but good to confirm. Posts coming up
It does look good at 800mm. Thanks again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
From WEX this evening:

We want you to know we haven't forgotten about your order!

Unfortunately, we're still awaiting stock from our supplier of one or more of your items.

Items:

1 x
Canon RF 200-800mm f6.3-9 IS USM Lens​
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0