• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Here are a couple of images of the EOS R1 and EOS R5 Mark II

It's literally like a flat ribbon cable and 1 pressure sensitive button. A bet a 3rd party will try to make one if canon isn't suing people.

it doesn't really matter. it's not a portrait grip anyways. and it's the shape of the grip that probably more determines if they are going to place controls on it or not.

I suspect Canon wants to discourage people from using the grip as a portrait grip because that would block airflow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
it doesn't really matter. it's not a portrait grip anyways. and it's the shape of the grip that probably more determines if they are going to place controls on it or not.

I suspect Canon wants to discourage people from using the grip as a portrait grip because that would block airflow.
I think It is just to enable 8k 60 fps RAW. I am fine with that. Keep the costs low. Very few people want these specs.
 
Upvote 0
4299 for the R5 Mk II

Wowww....If Canon wants to price R5II above $3999 i.e $4299 etc, then it may be having at least one of these features?

  • 60 MP Stills on a stacked sensor?
  • 16-bit RAW photos to rival Hasselblad X1D?
  • 16 Stops Dynamic Range? (True DR & not marketing BS)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R1
& given the current specs of the competition - Nikon Z9 (46MP), SonyA1 (50MP) :
I guess the
Canon R1 may be 45MP camera, so as not to be left behind. The R1 has to remain valid for the next 4 years at least.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The R5II + cooling grip makes it larger and more clunkly looking to me than the R1. That makes me think that either I won't bother with the cooling grip (as I haven't done video or astrophotography), or actually getting the R1 instead of the R5II. I shoot portrait shots more frequently than landscape, so I wouldn't want to take the cooling grip on/off to deal with it that way. I never thought I'd consider the R1 due to size, but this has made me consider it now and I'll have to think about the difference in # of sensor pixels vs whatever better things there are in the R1 vs the R5II. Maybe I'll have my "old" R5 and new R1? It's interesting since 2 options come out at the same time which (for me) compete against each other.
 
Upvote 0
The R5II + cooling grip makes it larger and more clunkly looking to me than the R1. That makes me think that either I won't bother with the cooling grip (as I haven't done video or astrophotography), or actually getting the R1 instead of the R5II. I shoot portrait shots more frequently than landscape, so I wouldn't want to take the cooling grip on/off to deal with it that way. I never thought I'd consider the R1 due to size, but this has made me consider it now and I'll have to think about the difference in # of sensor pixels vs whatever better things there are in the R1 vs the R5II. Maybe I'll have my "old" R5 and new R1? It's interesting since 2 options come out at the same time which (for me) compete against each other.
It is also rumored that there will be a portrait battery grip for the R5II, separate to the cooling grip. This may be more refined to your liking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0