Here is the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS R6, along with the announcement date

[blackcoffee17]

With F11 I expected something much closer to pancake design.

Not pancake but maybe i expected a bit smaller considering the 600mm is 3 stops slower than the F4 version and it's also DO.

 

[Richard CR]

If the 70-200 f4 is in the picture (and why wouldn't it be?) it seems that it's a black lens unlike it's EF counterpart. Also it has to be pretty compact otherwise it would stick out more.

I have to count the lenses.. maybe it's the one beside the 70-200 2.8L? but it looks fat for an F4.

I think this is right .. seems to be no 50mm or70-200 F4.

https://www.canonnews.com/image-of-the-upcoming-canon-rf-products-coming-july-9th

The lens with the ? I think it would be the 85mm Macro.

 

[Richard CR]

Not pancake but maybe i expected a bit smaller considering the 600mm is 3 stops slower than the F4 version and it's also DO.

we did a comparison. it's a TON smaller. look on our page, we have a comparison of the 100-400 against the super tele's .. they are night and day smaller.

 

[padam]

? could be the 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM
I think the RF 50mm f/1.8 STM and the RF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM are the two lenses missing from this picture, and they will be released a bit later on.

 

[DBounce]

I just hope the date doesn’t move back again.

 

[WriteLight]

Man, it's good to have some concrete dates but I was hoping it would ship sooner. Maybe it means that they want to minimize shortages. Does it still open for pre-orders on announcement?

 

[BroderLund]

Edit: my bad. It's the Ra on the far right

 

[Go Wild]

What's the fifth camera? It's the only one not showing its model number. Looks identical to the RP, but the RP is on the far right.

EOS Ra

 

[Starting out EOS R]

Good to have a date so everything will be out in the open. As I'm going to have to wait for the R5 if it as priced as expected. , I'd love to know if the 1.4 & 2 x extenders are compatible with the RF24-104 F4l and RF 70-200MF2.8? There have been some differing opinions. Some say yes they are, some say no they are not as the design of the lenses dont allow enough room between the sensor and the lens, also are they designed just for RF lenses or for EF / RF?

 

[Richard CR]

What's the fifth camera? It's the only one not showing its model number. Looks identical to the RP, but the RP is on the far right.

EOS Ra - That got me excited for 10 minutes until I remembered the Ra. the two right hand cameras are the same. just a slightly different perspective.

 

[padam]

Good to have a date so everything will be out in the open. As I'm going to have to wait for the R5 if it as priced as expected. , I'd love to know if the 1.4 & 2 x extenders are compatible with the RF24-104 F4l and RF 70-200MF2.8? There have been some differing opinions. Some say yes they are, some say no they are not as the design of the lenses dont allow enough room between the sensor and the lens, also are they designed just for RF lenses or for EF / RF?

The only lens, that will be compatible (for now) is the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
(and possibly the two f/11 DO lenses, but they are non-L lenses, so they might not be)

 

[Starting out EOS R]

As an aside to the huge announcements, can anyone offer any information on the drop in filter mounts? I can only find mounts that are for the EF-EOS R but none specifically to use with RF lenses?

 

[Starting out EOS R]

The only lens, that will be compatible (for now) is the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
(and possibly the two f/11 DO lenses, but they are non-L lenses, so they might not be)

Interesting, I cant find any information on this and canon won't comment. Not sure of the rationale for the bigger lenses to be compatible with the extenders? Why extend an already big lens and reduce the aperture even more? I might be looking at this the wrong way as I've never used extenders but wouldn't it make more sense for extenders to work with medium ranges like the 70-200?

So confusing

 

[Richard Anthony]

Any idea when the new flash units are going to be announced ?

 

[amorse]

As an aside to the huge announcements, can anyone offer any information on the drop in filter mounts? I can only find mounts that are for the EF-EOS R but none specifically to use with RF lenses?

I'm pretty sure the drop in filter mounts only work with the EF-RF adapter and there is no option to use those with RF lenses

 

[Sharlin]

Why extend an already big lens and reduce the aperture even more? I might be looking at this the wrong way as I've never used extenders but wouldn't it make more sense for extenders to work with medium ranges like the 70-200?

The 70–200mm is designed to exploit the short flange distance of the RF mount. Unfortunately that makes it physically incompatible with extenders.

 

[Kit.]

Do I understand correctly that R5 shows only one built-in microphone hole, while R6, R and Ra show two?

 

[LensFungus]

I don't see myself preordering the Canon R5 for September when Black Friday is only two months later.

 

[Eclipsed]

It appears the TCs are RF-RF, which suggests they are laying the foundation for an RF big white. I’d predict a RF300 f2.8.

 

[ildyria]

I have to count the lenses.. maybe it's the one beside the 70-200 2.8L? but it looks fat for an F4.

I think this is right .. seems to be no 50mm or70-200 F4.

https://www.canonnews.com/image-of-the-upcoming-canon-rf-products-coming-july-9th
View attachment 190859
The lens with the ? I think it would be the 85mm Macro.

Would be my guess. Though a 85 f/2 instead of the 50 would also make sense.