No one wanted an updated RP they wanted an updated RNo top down screen on a body this size still feels silly to me. Even more so now seeing the top layout.
Upvote
0
No one wanted an updated RP they wanted an updated RNo top down screen on a body this size still feels silly to me. Even more so now seeing the top layout.
“Hearsay” doesn’t mean unreliable or untrustworthy or self serving. It means second hand reports. Which is what it sounds like you’re asking for.Even if they did, would people take it to heart? Any time Sony/Nikon announces new advancements in DR I've always taken it with a grain of salt because we have no idea whether their value is comparing apples to apples when talking about values reported by any other authority/company. I agree - it's all hearsay until there are some comparable tests out there.
The biggest selling point of the 7d2 was its price. And only the R6 can match that. Everything is a compromise. The R5 certainly matches in resolution but the R6 is a damn fine offering for a 7d user to step up to FF. IF and the IF is very important, the EVF is quick enough and the build quality is god enough(obviously it won't match the 7d2 or R5 but as long as it is good ENOUGH)They both will have that.
To tell what the replacement is, you should look at features/utility the 7D has, that only one of the other two cameras provides.
Really depends on the purpose of the camera. I am hoping that R6 is a low light beast and will truly rock at low light. I see a scenario where I am shooting the R5 (40+ max) during the best lighting conditions and then switching to the R6 when the light is marginal and even 1 stop can make a difference. This is especially true if shooting the 600 / 800 f11. I am not convinced the f11 lenses will work for me (DOF as well as speed), but I am going to order the 800mm and give it a try. I just sold my 200-400 f4 (weight NOT dissatisfaction with the lens) and will probably buy or rent a big white when I want to get serious. The idea of a light, packable 800mm has appeal when I wan tot go light or can live with the tradeoffs. The 100-500 + 1.4x TC should take care of anything up to 700mm as long as it matches the performance of the 100-400 II. I have 1dx II 20mp file prints in 30x45 and even a 40x60 hanging on my wall that look just fine - and I am very picky about IQ. The quality of large prints from a 20mp file depends on the camera, lens, amount of crop, lighting conditions and the photographer choosing the optimal settings.I have to google what zebras are. The 20mp is a joke though.
The biggest selling point of the 7d2 was its price. And only the R6 can match that. Everything is a compromise. The R5 certainly matches in resolution but the R6 is a damn fine offering for a 7d user to step up to FF. IF and the IF is very important, the EVF is quick enough and the build quality is god enough(obviously it won't match the 7d2 or R5 but as long as it is good ENOUGH)
I found Fred Miranda to be the answer.My only real question is, should I take my chances selling my 6D to sketchy buyers on eBay or just trade in at the local camera shop for a lower price but no hassle?
what "both"? we were talking about the 7D - which only has AF down to F/8 - and certainly does not have animal / bird eye AF .. iTR only works on heads.They both will have that.
To tell what the replacement is, you should look at features/utility the 7D has, that only one of the other two cameras provides.
Facts. It's not the same sensors because each camera they make has a different sensor in them that is your's after you purchase it.Canon always says it's not the same sensor even if 99% is the same.
If hearsay is apples to apples comparisons by a third party with nothing to gain or lose in the reporting, then yes I'd rather have hearsay than a company claiming they've improved dynamic range up to x stops. I just can see any manufacturer reporting any metric for dynamic range and have that be valuable without something to compare it to.“Hearsay” doesn’t mean unreliable or untrustworthy or self serving. It means second hand reports. Which is what it sounds like you’re asking for.
yupGetting the R5 was always a given for me. Planned to keep the R, but will sell it for an R6. I love the EOS R, but the video shooter side of me cannot ignore the IBIS and uncropped shooting modes.
Four years ago before my divorce from Canon I would have been begging Canon to take my money for this. But today I have such a wonderful camera in the Lumix S1, my reaction is eh.. good for Canon. They are very late to the game but better late than never. I will keep my fantastic S1. Can I see myself ever getting this ? I don't know. The video quality won't be on par with the S1 but it will have decent AF-C. So maybe one day when the price has dropped sufficiently and I am in a need of a B-cam with good AF-C I may consider. But I don't see that happening anytime soon. Plus my S1 is utterly fantastic.
Really?Facts. It's not the same sensors because each camera they make has a different sensor in them.
The video quality won't be on par with the S1