How's the RX-100 Miii? Should I?

wtlloyd said:
I quite like these...wish the exif wasn't stripped out of the images.

What ISO was the camera shooting at with the museum interior? The noise level is quite acceptable.

albron00 said:
My wife has RX100, shoots in raw+jpeg...
Some more pictures with EXIF data avalable.
 

Attachments

  • 20130203-DSC00378.jpg
    20130203-DSC00378.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 240
  • 20130203-DSC00381.jpg
    20130203-DSC00381.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 211
  • 20140206-DSC02258.jpg
    20140206-DSC02258.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 263
Upvote 0
Thank you for trying - perhaps something is wrong with my exif viewer, but I tried to save image as and view in Breezebrowser, no shooting data comes up...

Was just curious about the ISO in the museum interior shot.





albron00 said:
wtlloyd said:
I quite like these...wish the exif wasn't stripped out of the images.

What ISO was the camera shooting at with the museum interior? The noise level is quite acceptable.

albron00 said:
My wife has RX100, shoots in raw+jpeg...
Some more pictures with EXIF data avalable.
 
Upvote 0
wtlloyd said:
Thank you for trying - perhaps something is wrong with my exif viewer, but I tried to save image as and view in Breezebrowser, no shooting data comes up...

Was just curious about the ISO in the museum interior shot.





albron00 said:
wtlloyd said:
I quite like these...wish the exif wasn't stripped out of the images.

What ISO was the camera shooting at with the museum interior? The noise level is quite acceptable.

albron00 said:
My wife has RX100, shoots in raw+jpeg...
Some more pictures with EXIF data avalable.


OK, I've got EXIF screenshot for museum interior picture (attached).
 

Attachments

  • EXIF.JPG
    EXIF.JPG
    19.2 KB · Views: 670
Upvote 0
andrewflo said:
I played with one at the Sony store recently. The auto focus is INSANELY fast. Faster than my 6D with L glass it felt like.
I wouldn't say that RX100 auto focus is faster than my 5Dm3 (cannot say about 6D), accept if you use 85mm L lens (known for its slow focusing speed) but it is much faster compare to other compact cameras I've knew or owned.
 
Upvote 0
Thank you :)

albron00 said:
wtlloyd said:
Thank you for trying - perhaps something is wrong with my exif viewer, but I tried to save image as and view in Breezebrowser, no shooting data comes up...

Was just curious about the ISO in the museum interior shot.





albron00 said:
wtlloyd said:
I quite like these...wish the exif wasn't stripped out of the images.

What ISO was the camera shooting at with the museum interior? The noise level is quite acceptable.

albron00 said:
My wife has RX100, shoots in raw+jpeg...
Some more pictures with EXIF data avalable.


OK, I've got EXIF screenshot for museum interior picture (attached).
 
Upvote 0
In general, when using this camera outdoors in good lighting conditions, I have been very happy with the results. The RAW-files are a lot better than I had expected of a camera like this.

But last weekend I did not bring any of the DSLRs to an arrangement, only the RX-100 III. I was trying to shoot fairly simple images of people making speeches and some other slow pace indoor subjects. It became quite clear to me that a camera like that has significant limits. AF-speed in dim light, limitations with the on-camera flash, delays etc. made it close to impossible. I normally share images like that with those present, but in this case they will never leave my hard disk.
 
Upvote 0
Had a RX100, now the RX100 III:
If you have the money and want the best camera this size I highly recommend it.

The EVF is small but very useful at sunlight, the lens is much more useful at both ends- I always wanted a 24mm, and now, at the long end, the drop in f- stops is less dramatic.

(The Canon 1" has no viewfinder, coming a bit late. Yes, cheaper.)
 
Upvote 0