If Canon made a " truly ultimate" DSLR body for, say, $10k would you buy it?

If Canon made a " truly ultimate" DSLR body for, say, $10k would you buy it?

  • Yes

    Votes: 26 19.3%
  • No

    Votes: 109 80.7%

  • Total voters
    135
  • Poll closed .
This is like buying an 18K gold cell phone. What do 2 years later when the next one comes out?

Gold-Privé-Phone.jpg
 
Upvote 0
I had a Crop DSLR that sold for $35,500 new! It was truly the ultimate camera for 1995, 6MP and it shot raw images as well.

It was 10 years old when I bought it for $100, and it was still going. Unless a camera is going to make a lot of $$$ for you, its a sucker bet.

DCS%20460Kodak_DCS460001-XL.jpg
 
Upvote 0
For 10K, it would have to be medium format.
To me, the 1Ds are just too big and too heavy for just a 35mm sensor.

I love my 5D3, as do so many others here, and it does everything I've ever asked of it, and believe me, I do a wide range of photography.

For 10K, a body would be able to turn up to the photos jobs itself and do the job without me.
 
Upvote 0
The point many of you seem to be missing is product maturity, the phones are a great example, they are getting bigger again now.

The old DCS was never able to print to the sizes we can now with the colour depth and DR levels, we are already at diminishing returns, as for form factor, I don't want a smaller camera than the 1 series, lighter would be nice, but not smaller, I like mirrors, etc etc.

If the camera in our minds, the OP's "truly ultimate" model, can more than produce the output we want and need how much does it matter that a newer better model might come out in five years? My seven year old cameras takes images that pay for my lifestyle every single day, I clearly don't 'need' more than that, it will be nice when I get it, and I will use it to take images I can't at the moment, but when I get the ability to shoot at 10,000 iso I really won't care when somebody else can shoot at 15,000 iso a year or two later, 10,000 is well outside the range that I will need, same with DR, colour depth, fps AF etc etc etc. When more than enough has been easily surpassed we are just into a pissing contest, and I don't need that.
 
Upvote 0
At $5k, maybe. Probably not at $10k. And for me to pay that much, it would have to be truly ultimate. Here's an idea of what ultimate means to me....

Image sensor features:
  • Full-frame sensor
  • 52 MP (same pixel density as 7D Mark II)
  • Ideally, a stacked sensor, but not if that requires giving up DPAF
  • 10 FPS or faster

Focusing system features:
  • 61-point AF similar to 1DX, plus:
  • Eye tracking
  • DPAF with automatic AFMA support
  • Optional exposure/color-balance-follows-focus mode

Other still shooting features:
  • Continuously variable shooting speed controlled by button-press depth (with manual override lock)
  • Crop mode w/ hybrid viewfinder masking to allow you to treat it like a 7D Mark II, resolution and all
  • Compatibility with EF-S lenses using a slide-flip mirror system that activates in the presence of an EF-S lens, for when you want to travel light

Video features:
  • 8K 4:2:2 and 4K 4:4:4 video support in addition to existing modes
  • Continuous autofocus with variable focus pull speeds
  • Clean Mini-DisplayPort (v1.3) to allow 8K output (either instead of HDMI, or in addition to HDMI)
  • Digital audio I/O through battery compartment contacts to allow attachment of a four-channel XLR input grip for when you're actually serious....

Communication/sensor features:
  • World-band LTE
  • Wi-Fi
  • GPS (w/ aGPS when cellular or Wi-Fi is available)
  • Digital compass
  • High-resolution 6-axis accelerometer/gyroscope with precise data recorded in EXIF
  • Bluetooth LE and NFC support for rapid tethering to iOS and Android devices

Miscellaneous software features
  • Running Android or iOS, with the ability to add arbitrary apps
  • Camera control SDK, allowing third-party apps to fully control the hardware

Miscellaneous hardware features:
  • Dual SD slots with full support for UHS-II at maximum speed (faster than CF) to allow continuous RAW shooting at the slower 4 FPS speed with backups, or 8 FPS when alternating between the two slots
  • 64 GB of internal flash storage for apps, also usable for photo storage, enabling continuous RAW shooting at the full 10 FPS when combined with two UHS-II flash cards
  • Thunderbolt support through Mini-DisplayPort connection, w/ gigabit Ethernet dongle support
  • Pop-up flash for use in a pinch


Do that, and you have my attention. That, folks, is what innovation looks like. Anything less, and you're nowhere near the limits of what is practical with today's technology. Quit holding back.
 
Upvote 0
I have some difficulty seeing what Canon could pack into a camera to justify a $10k price tag. However, if its focus is video, I’ll pass. If it is photography I would be interested. 50MP max resolution, with lower resolution modes, evolutionary improvements to the 1DX functionality, improved high ISO performance, improved DR (sorry, it just slipped out), I also expect to see DPAF, wifi (did not think I would say that, but I see the value) and GPS. But to justify $10k it would have to contain something more jaw dropping than that.

I’m not even in the neighbourhood of having the skills, nor the need, to justify a $10k camera. However, I have glass for a lot more, so from that perspective it would improve the balance. And, being sufficiently old and with a hard earned self-knowledge, I am aware of my weak character and how easily I’m tempted by the latest and greatest, so I voted yes …
 
Upvote 0
So... what would this Miracle Camera do for me that my present equipment can't? Make me rich? Make me famous?

I can't imagine Canon having the cachet of Leica or Zeiss. Leica and Zeiss are just "bling". They can get away with charging ridiculous prices for things that are not demonstrably better than anything made by Nikon or Canon. Canon can't/shouldn't play that game.
 
Upvote 0
Most women, wine, and lenses age in a well-behaved way. Men and camera bodies don't...
So for that kind of a price the ultimate Canon would have to be of a more flexible, perhaps, modular design - an insurance that the body would be able to live on for a long time.
I earn quite a decent salary when I work, but at $10,000 it would still be a number of months net income, and would be incredibly hard to justify for a hobby. I have to say no.
 
Upvote 0
My answer is no for three reasons:

1. I can't pay $10K for a camera.

My father would say the rest is just excuses, but still...

2. I bought a 5DmkIII, which is expensive to begin with. Add the features I'd like, e.g. sensor with better IQ, and the added value wouldn't push it across the $5K line.

3. As others have noted, for $10K one can get a medium format camera with lots of cash to spare. That sum is just above the price range for a 35mm camera.
 
Upvote 0
Perhaps the question should have been, what would you pay for an all singing, occasionally rapping, all dancing DSLR that is the ultimate in every single aspect.

Well, considering the 1DX is about $7000, we need to ask, where does it fall short for genres such as portraiture, landscapes and the like and ball park how much, in dollar value, that would add to the entire price?
 
Upvote 0