This may seem like a stupid question! When we go on www.photozone.de to look at lens test and then compare resolution charts for each lens that are based on the Imatest (LW/PH), it make sense if I only look at Canon lens say done with a FF camera.
Where I am puzzle is why when I also look at the same test for a similar Nikon lens also done on a full frame camera the LW/PH and hence the resolution always seem higher (the graphs always show a higher number). I thought that with the 5D at 21MP and Nikon FF being at 12MP these test would almost always show Canon lens having higher resolution.
Does anyone understand the differences? Am I comparing apple to oranges here? Thanks in advance for your response...
Where I am puzzle is why when I also look at the same test for a similar Nikon lens also done on a full frame camera the LW/PH and hence the resolution always seem higher (the graphs always show a higher number). I thought that with the 5D at 21MP and Nikon FF being at 12MP these test would almost always show Canon lens having higher resolution.
Does anyone understand the differences? Am I comparing apple to oranges here? Thanks in advance for your response...