Is there a need for a 50mm?

Nov 17, 2013
145
0
6,271
After a lot of research and hesitations, I think I've got the lenses that I want, for now ;)
I own the 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 f/2.8 II, 70-200 f/2.8 II and the 100mm f/2.8 L.
And yes, there it is. The 50mm plastic fantastic. Still there. Would you sell this one or would you keep it or change it for the 50mm f/1.4?
 
If you don't use it and don't need it as light, compact and fast "emergency backup" ... Then sell it.

I would not buy the current canon 50/1.4 or 50/1.2 L instead. Neither are really worth the money. Maybe canon will come up with a really good and priceworthy 50/1.8 IS sometome soon. In line with 24, 28 / 2.8 is and 35/2 IS.
 
Upvote 0
Jack56 said:
After a lot of research and hesitations, I think I've got the lenses that I want, for now ;)
I own the 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 f/2.8 II, 70-200 f/2.8 II and the 100mm f/2.8 L.
And yes, there it is. The 50mm plastic fantastic. Still there. Would you sell this one or would you keep it or change it for the 50mm f/1.4?

I'd keep it. You've got the 24-70 which also covers 50, but if you already spent the money, why take the hit? It's a great lens, especially for the money.

If you want the f/1.4, you can always get that too, but how much money do you realistically expect to get selling a lens that sells new for slightly over $100? Unless, I'm mistaken as to the lens you're referring to.
 
Upvote 0
If you look in my signature, I have the same lenses as you do and trust me, even f/1.4 is sometimes barely enough. Keep the fifty, it's a lightweight little wonder lens :)
 
Upvote 0
Jack56 said:
wickidwombat said:
why sell it do you need the cash that badly? you'd get what 50 maybe 60 bucks for it...
No, of course not. But, why keep stuff when you don't use it?
Sounds like you've answered your question here. If you don't see any value in keeping it, the letting it go is the best option for you. I agree with the others here and recommend keeping it for those times when f/2.8 isn't fast enough - the money is already sunk.
 
Upvote 0
I sold my 50 1.8 II for about $60. Not for the money but just to reduce the amount of unused gear I had. There were definite situations that I could have still used it (prob shoulda kept mine tbh). I ended up replacing it recent(ish)ly with the old Sigma 1.4 which I got used. I actually quite like the Sigma, it's useable wide open and great at f/2. I found the plastic fantastic not so fantastic wide open and it really needed to be stopped down at least to f/2.2 (which makes it kinda pointless when you have an excellent f/2.8 zoom). My zooms are all f/4 which would have made more sense to keep it.

Weird. I miss that lens but I also don't ...
 
Upvote 0
ULFULFSEN said:
neuroanatomist said:
Well, aside from that one lens, everything else you have is f/2.8 or slower. I find fast primes to be very useful on some occasions...

Fast zooms are not usefull on occasion....? ???

Of course they are, and the OP already has two of the best fast zoom lenses available (24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II).

Well, I think f/2.8 is a fast zoom lens. Perhaps you can recommend some zoom lenses faster than f/2.8 which are fully compatible with the OP's 5DIII body?
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
ULFULFSEN said:
neuroanatomist said:
Well, aside from that one lens, everything else you have is f/2.8 or slower. I find fast primes to be very useful on some occasions...

Fast zooms are not usefull on occasion....? ???

Of course they are, and the OP already has two of the best fast zoom lenses available (24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II).

Well, I think f/2.8 is a fast zoom lens. Perhaps you can recommend some zoom lenses faster than f/2.8 which are fully compatible with the OP's 5DIII body?

I'd just be interested in knowing of a fast zoom that's faster than f/2.8 regardless of the make/compatibility. I've never seen one to my knowledge.
 
Upvote 0
Mitch.Conner said:
I'd just be interested in knowing of a fast zoom that's faster than f/2.8 regardless of the make/compatibility. I've never seen one to my knowledge.

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8...generally considered an excellent lens. It's for APS-C only, though.
 
Upvote 0
I would sell it. I have one and every time use it, I don't care for it. And you have a lot better lens than me. I would recommend the 40mm 2.8 to replace it. Yes the 40mm isn't faster than the other lens you have but it is a lot smaller. I love walking around with my 70-200 with the 40 in my pocket.
 
Upvote 0
I have a similar set of lenses. I had a 50 1.4 for about 10 years and sold it because I always took it with me but seldom really used it much. When Sigma released the 50 1.4 Art, I was sure I would get one immediately. But I am still wondering if it would be just another piece of glass sitting in my closet, especially considering it's weight.
 
Upvote 0
AvTvM said:
If you don't use it and don't need it as light, compact and fast "emergency backup" ... Then sell it.

I would not buy the current canon 50/1.4 or 50/1.2 L instead. Neither are really worth the money. Maybe canon will come up with a really good and priceworthy 50/1.8 IS sometome soon. In line with 24, 28 / 2.8 is and 35/2 IS.

As long as this is the case, the old 50mm f/1.8 Mk I is still the best of the Canon 50's as far as I'm concerned.
 
Upvote 0