Is This a Canon EF 11-24 f/4L?
- Thread starter TokyoDekopon
- Start date
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
Definitely not a 17-40L body, closer in style to the 8-15L but not the same. As for Canon never putting a red ring on the hood.
TLN said:
Definitely not a 17-40L body, closer in style to the 8-15L but not the same. As for Canon never putting a red ring on the hood.
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
Indeed, a very good point
F4 is ...very pausible, but that front element looks like the one from the Ts-e 17mm
Yeah, the body shell looks sort of outdated, if one compares it with recent WA zoom releases
YuengLinger said:
Indeed, a very good point
F4 is ...very pausible, but that front element looks like the one from the Ts-e 17mm
Yeah, the body shell looks sort of outdated, if one compares it with recent WA zoom releases
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
Why not? The hood is integrated and where else would they put the ring?
Plus the inside of the hood and the front element look totally different than the 14-24 2.8 Nikkor.
TLN said:
Why not? The hood is integrated and where else would they put the ring?
Plus the inside of the hood and the front element look totally different than the 14-24 2.8 Nikkor.
Upvote
0
davidcl0nel
Canon R5, 17 TSE, RF35+85 IS, RF70-200 4 IS, EF135
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
The hood is so big, a red ring at the end of the lens wouldn't be very visible.
The hood is so big, a red ring at the end of the lens wouldn't be very visible.
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
That's not the hood! That's the body of lens. Yes with some parts stick out and make a hood. That would not be removable. And my 300mm f4 has the ring on the sliding but non-removable hood.
That's not the hood! That's the body of lens. Yes with some parts stick out and make a hood. That would not be removable. And my 300mm f4 has the ring on the sliding but non-removable hood.
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
Also, um, well, I'm pretty sure Photokina is going on and it would make no sense for them to announce it later this year unless they do a development announcement this week.
+1, something about the lighting on the hood doesn't match the body of the lens & front element.YuengLinger said:
Also, um, well, I'm pretty sure Photokina is going on and it would make no sense for them to announce it later this year unless they do a development announcement this week.
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
It could be exceptionally good photoshop, but it could also be real.
1. Canon does put L rings on hoods, and in this case the hood is integrated.
2. The spacing between the FL markers is very realistic for a UWA.
3. The ridges on the hood are Canon-style, not like the 14-24.
4. The bulge of the front element and the rings around it look neither like the 14-24, nor the TSE 17mm or the 14/2.8L II. It is very distinctive.
5. The body is also unlike any existing Canon lens. Especially the infra red markers are the first for a Canon UWA I think, and the focusing window is very typical for an UWA (so it is not all copied from a standard zoom).
So yeah, it could be a very elaborate hoax, and if so, kudos to the artist. Or real
It could be exceptionally good photoshop, but it could also be real.
1. Canon does put L rings on hoods, and in this case the hood is integrated.
2. The spacing between the FL markers is very realistic for a UWA.
3. The ridges on the hood are Canon-style, not like the 14-24.
4. The bulge of the front element and the rings around it look neither like the 14-24, nor the TSE 17mm or the 14/2.8L II. It is very distinctive.
5. The body is also unlike any existing Canon lens. Especially the infra red markers are the first for a Canon UWA I think, and the focusing window is very typical for an UWA (so it is not all copied from a standard zoom).
So yeah, it could be a very elaborate hoax, and if so, kudos to the artist. Or real
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
The 17 TS-E when shifted makes an 11mm rectilinear panorama. So the front elements should be similar.
The 17 TS-E when shifted makes an 11mm rectilinear panorama. So the front elements should be similar.
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
Just Canon? AFAIK, only Sigma has 12-24mm (not stellar performer, but decent), all other manufacturers have only 14mm and above.
I don't know, personally, 11mm seems over the top. Everything will be distorted like black hole event horizon...
steliosk said:
Just Canon? AFAIK, only Sigma has 12-24mm (not stellar performer, but decent), all other manufacturers have only 14mm and above.
I don't know, personally, 11mm seems over the top. Everything will be distorted like black hole event horizon...
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
Ok, I oversimplified. The bulge is similar, but the look is different due to the elements inside the front element. Wouldn't you agree?
privatebydesign said:
Ok, I oversimplified. The bulge is similar, but the look is different due to the elements inside the front element. Wouldn't you agree?
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
I have the Sigma 12-24 II for a while and with practice, you can get some pretty awesome results. 11mm would blow my mind and I'd be first in line for the pre-order if this thing is actually real.Khalai said:
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
It's been said to work well on the upcoming 42MP 1DsX.
It's been said to work well on the upcoming 42MP 1DsX.
Upvote
0
Re: EF11-24mm F4L listed on a Japanese site
FYI, it was posted in the following page as the image of EF24-105mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM. They changed it to the correct image after a short while. Not just me but a lot of people saw it. Looking forward to the official announcement!
http://kakaku.com/item/K0000693675/#tab
FYI, it was posted in the following page as the image of EF24-105mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM. They changed it to the correct image after a short while. Not just me but a lot of people saw it. Looking forward to the official announcement!
http://kakaku.com/item/K0000693675/#tab
Upvote
0
Is This the Canon EF 11-24 f/4L?
HTML:
<p>The <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/canon-ef-11-24-f2-8l-coming-cr1/" target="_blank">previously rumored EF 11-24 f/4L</a> (which we had as an f/2.8) may have shown up on kakaku.com for a short period of time.</p>
<div id="attachment_17380" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/canon1124.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-17380" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/canon1124.jpg" alt="EF 11-24 f/4L - Real or Fake?" width="500" height="440" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">EF 11-24 f/4L – Real or Fake?</p></div>
<p>What do you think, real or fake?</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://digicame-info.com/2014/09/ef11-24mm-f4l.html" target="_blank">DCI</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
Upvote
0
Could be real.
It makes sense to give the 16-35 f/4 IS next to a 11-24 f/4 (non-IS and extra 5mm at the wide-end) so there is for both space in the line-up
Maybe photoshop experts can do an analysis?...
It makes sense to give the 16-35 f/4 IS next to a 11-24 f/4 (non-IS and extra 5mm at the wide-end) so there is for both space in the line-up
Maybe photoshop experts can do an analysis?...
Upvote
0
Similar threads
