L Lens Packaging and Hoods, Cost-cutting Effort?

danfaz

Coffee Fiend
Jul 14, 2015
981
1,948
19,214
Interesting discovery yesterday as I opened a new RF 24-70 L...
First, the internal packaging the lens sat in used to be thick, snug-fitting Styrofoam, and the pouch and literature sat in a cardboard insert above the top Styrofoam.

Now, the lens sits in thin, not-so-snug plastic molds and the pouch and literature sit in the empty space of the top plastic mold.
This is similar to consumer-grade lenses I've purchased before. Not a HUGE deal, but I noticed the lens is a little loose in this setup and wobbles about a bit, and it just looks a bit cheap IMO.

Second, the lens hood is made in China now. All my L hoods are made in Japan. Here, too, not a HUGE deal, but just seems a little bit cheaper. And of course, these cost-cutting efforts don't reduce the price of the lens, but maybe it's keeping the price from going up?

What do you all think?
 
Last edited:
Injection-molded plastic packaging is generally recyclable via household recycling programs, styrofoam is generally not...so, a switch from styrofoam to plastic would be an environmentally responsible choice whether it is cheaper for Canon or not (probably is, but I don't know).

I have 5 RF lenses (14-35/4L, 24-105/4L, 28-70/2L, 70-200/2.8L, 100-500L), all the hoods are made in Japan. Also, all the boxes have the styrofoam packaging (the RF 1.4x and 2x extenders were just in bubble wrap in the boxes). I got the 24-105 along with my EOS R in 2019, the other four lenses I bought last summer, after the announcement of the R3 and in anticipation of switching to that (from the 1D X) as my primary camera.

I doubt these cost reductions affect the price Canon sets for the lenses, rather they just mean more profit for Canon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
[..]ow, the lens sits in thin, not-so-snug plastic molds and the pouch and literature sit in the empty space of the top plastic mold.
This is similar to consumer-grade lenses I've purchased before.[..]
The RF15-30 STM released this month has 1.3 layers of bubblewrap around it, so something molded is already a big step up from that :)

It is the stingiest packaging for a Canon lens I've seen so far. But it worked, so I'm not going to spend more thoughts on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
The RF15-30 STM released this month has 1.3 layers of bubblewrap around it, so something molded is already a big step up from that :)

It is the stingiest packaging for a Canon lens I've seen so far. But it worked, so I'm not going to spend more thoughts on it.
As I said, the RF extenders come like that. At least the bubble wrap is the thick stuff, and the boxes are thick cardboard. Some of my EF-M lenses came in thin bubble wrap in thin cardboard.
 
Upvote 0
One more observation – for two of the L lenses above, the pouch was in a plastic bag, but for the other three the pouch was just ‘naked’ above the cardboard partition at the top of the box.
 
Upvote 0
Did the goods arrive damage-free? If yes then let us look for ways to reduce the carbon footprint.
Well, as far as I can tell for now. The wobble factor initially concerned me. I know it's L glass, but I do prefer the solidity of the Styrofoam.
Perhaps they could make the plastic more form-fitting.
Also, I'm not into waste, either. I keep all of my boxes and packaging in case of resale, I never throw them away.
 
Upvote 0