JustMeOregon said:All of the examples of laser damage that I've seen have been while shooting video. Has anyone ever heard of a sensor getting zapped while shooting still photos? I have no doubt that it's possible, but is laser damage at all likely with a relatively fast shutter speed?
Mt Spokane Photography said:Yup, we see posts about this from time to time, its been happening for years, but a reminder every once in a while might prevent someone from having the issue.
I was not aware of this ... I've been to several shows, shooting video footage, while lots of laser beams blasting around ... looks like I was lucky that none of them reached my sensor ... henceforth, I'll be more careful ... thanks for sharing.jaket84 said:
expatinasia said:Mt Spokane Photography said:Yup, we see posts about this from time to time, its been happening for years, but a reminder every once in a while might prevent someone from having the issue.
A useful reminder to have, thanks.
Does anyone know what about the laser actually kills the sensor?
You can get very narrow filters to cut out a very specific wavelength, but they are VERY!!! expensive (thousand dollars plus) and you have to know the exact wavelength of the laser in use.... which is particularly problematic when they use different colors of lasers.... It would be a lot cheaper to buy a dozen T3is and throw them out if the sensor got ruined...scyrene said:Is there any kind of filter that could be used to prevent this, or at least reduce the risk? I appreciate it would involve light loss, and therefore further darkening in an already dark environment, but maybe a polarising filter? It seems too high a risk otherwise :/
So I thank Canon for releasing the much criticized T5...Don Haines said:You can get very narrow filters to cut out a very specific wavelength, but they are VERY!!! expensive (thousand dollars plus) and you have to know the exact wavelength of the laser in use.... which is particularly problematic when they use different colors of lasers.... It would be a lot cheaper to buy a dozen T3is and throw them out if the sensor got ruined...scyrene said:Is there any kind of filter that could be used to prevent this, or at least reduce the risk? I appreciate it would involve light loss, and therefore further darkening in an already dark environment, but maybe a polarising filter? It seems too high a risk otherwise :/
Don Haines said:You can get very narrow filters to cut out a very specific wavelength, but they are VERY!!! expensive (thousand dollars plus) and you have to know the exact wavelength of the laser in use.... which is particularly problematic when they use different colors of lasers.... It would be a lot cheaper to buy a dozen T3is and throw them out if the sensor got ruined...scyrene said:Is there any kind of filter that could be used to prevent this, or at least reduce the risk? I appreciate it would involve light loss, and therefore further darkening in an already dark environment, but maybe a polarising filter? It seems too high a risk otherwise :/
Does anyone know what about the laser actually kills the sensor?
put it like this.... it is an offense to shine one of those "cat toy" lasers into someone's eyes.....dtaylor said:If these nightclub lasers are damaging sensors, what the heck are they doing to eyeballs?![]()