HTML:
<p>The first image of the Canon Speedlight 470EX AI Auto Bounce has leaked.</p>
<p>There are no specifications for the new flash yet.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<p>The first image of the Canon Speedlight 470EX AI Auto Bounce has leaked.</p>
<p>There are no specifications for the new flash yet.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
ScottyP said:What is “auto bounce”?
All with no camera shake due to inertial damping fields. Antimatter power cell not included.Talys said:ScottyP said:What is “auto bounce”?
360 degree sensors evaluate the room and the subject, then a motorized head automatically rotates the flash to likely best exposure, based on your selection of 5 steps between "dramatic" and "symmetrical" 8)
Ok, well, here's wishin'
Chaitanya said:No RT? Thats odd.
H. Jones said:Chaitanya said:No RT? Thats odd.
It is possible that Canon no longer feels the need to add "RT" to the name and now just includes it as a standard, but that's assuming a lot on my part. I just can't really imagine a new flash without RT, especially considering the (relatively) low price of the 430EX-RT, so I'm not sure how this makes sense. I guess Canon could be releasing a very cheap flash to compete with Chinese knockoffs, but those have RT, so why not?
Interested to see what this "autobounce" is, but guess it could be that it detects the distance to the bouncing surface and adjusts based on that. Highly doubt the flash head moves on its own power, since that would suck batteries like no tomorrow.
magarity said:All with no camera shake due to inertial damping fields. Antimatter power cell not included.Talys said:ScottyP said:What is “auto bounce”?
360 degree sensors evaluate the room and the subject, then a motorized head automatically rotates the flash to likely best exposure, based on your selection of 5 steps between "dramatic" and "symmetrical" 8)
Ok, well, here's wishin'
Canon has been quite explicit to mention RT when it came to their speedlights(even macro lights have RT branding). So its highly unlikely canon will drop RT branding on their lights. With 600ex-RT and 430ex-RT you can buy non radio capable lights at lower prices, as I have bought 430ex III which is non RT version.H. Jones said:Chaitanya said:No RT? Thats odd.
It is possible that Canon no longer feels the need to add "RT" to the name and now just includes it as a standard, but that's assuming a lot on my part. I just can't really imagine a new flash without RT, especially considering the (relatively) low price of the 430EX-RT, so I'm not sure how this makes sense. I guess Canon could be releasing a very cheap flash to compete with Chinese knockoffs, but those have RT, so why not?
Interested to see what this "autobounce" is, but guess it could be that it detects the distance to the bouncing surface and adjusts based on that. Highly doubt the flash head moves on its own power, since that would suck batteries like no tomorrow.
Chaitanya said:No RT? Thats odd.
brad-man said:Maybe it's a budget flash with no hotshoe lock and it falls off often...
brad-man said:Maybe it's abudgetflash with no hotshoe lock and it falls off often...
CanonFanBoy said:No RT needed. The Speedlite and the soon to be announced firmware update allow photographer, camera, and flash to all communicate telepathically.
LDS said:CanonFanBoy said:No RT needed. The Speedlite and the soon to be announced firmware update allow photographer, camera, and flash to all communicate telepathically.
I'm more scared one day flashes will have a SIM and will connect to your camera only through a Canon cloud server... for which you'll have to pay a subscription fee....
Now there’s a concept. A flash with adjustable white balance. If it could do up to full stop cto, ctb, and ctg, that might be enough for me to consider one, even though I normally consider Canon flashes overpriced.Jim Saunders said:Some kind of automatic colour matching? I'd consider evolving my collection for that.
Jim
IglooEater said:Now there’s a concept. A flash with adjustable white balance. If it could do up to full stop cto, ctb, and ctg, that might be enough for me to consider one, even though I normally consider Canon flashes overpriced.Jim Saunders said:Some kind of automatic colour matching? I'd consider evolving my collection for that.
Jim
Talys said:IglooEater said:Now there’s a concept. A flash with adjustable white balance. If it could do up to full stop cto, ctb, and ctg, that might be enough for me to consider one, even though I normally consider Canon flashes overpriced.Jim Saunders said:Some kind of automatic colour matching? I'd consider evolving my collection for that.
Jim
I want the flip-down diffuser to be replaceable with gels. Quarter cut CTO is the one I'd keep on there most of the time.
In these cases the photographer will have to be firmware upgraded too ;DIglooEater said:LDS said:CanonFanBoy said:No RT needed. The Speedlite and the soon to be announced firmware update allow photographer, camera, and flash to all communicate telepathically.
I'm more scared one day flashes will have a SIM and will connect to your camera only through a Canon cloud server... for which you'll have to pay a subscription fee....
Yea, probably. But that’s okay because the subscription will cost less than buying a new flash every year.