Lenses that inspire you?

Status
Not open for further replies.
paul13walnut5 said:
Kyle,

A lot of these guys are shooting full frame.. you can get similar results on APS-C for a lot less (I note you are using a 30D)

Check out the 200mm f2.8 L II (behaves like a 320mm f2.8) and is an excellent sharp lens on APS-C.

Also check out the 100mm f2.0 USM (behaves like 160 f2.0) and is also an excellent sharp lens on APS-C.

At vastly cheaper prices than the big boys. Don't get me wrong the big boys are brilliant and better... but you don't have to remortgage the house to get some very very nice canon glass, especially if you are shooting on APS-C!

Thanks for the advice, Paul. I'm an amateur photographer, and a camera and lens repair hobbyist. What is normally a fairly expensive hobby (photography), I have managed to get into pretty cheap by buying really good deals, and repairing broken equipment. I'm not looking to get any L lenses right now, but I definitely appreciate the beautiful images they can create. That's why I'm so excited about my 85mm f/1.8 that's on it's way now, it's an inexpensive and fast lens that has nearly-L image quality.
 
Upvote 0
KyleSTL said:
Seems like there is a consensus that those who own 200mm f/2L IS lenses are inspired by them. For anyone who wants inspiration (and doesn't mind owning a lens that is in less-than-pristine condition), it is available in 7/10 condition at lensrentals for $4400 shipped:

http://www.lensrentals.com/buy/canon/canon-200mm-f2l-is-serial-number-13206

thanks for the heads up! now to convince them to send it to australia! last time they said they wont sell to oz :(
 
Upvote 0
I usually don't change lens,s a lot as I don't see any difference at the sizes I print but got a great offer for my used 70-200 f2.8 is L so took a punt on a used new model. It's now my most used lens, never without it in the bag. No image difference I can spot when stopped down but wide open it's excellent, better than the old one. Focus,s a bit faster and the I.s is out of this world. Not quite as sharp as my sigma 1.4 but all in all, very amazing lens and I must say, a great upgrade, especially what I paid.

Mick
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II

I use this lens to correct converging verticals. However, I keep using it as much as possible. So I have to use my feet and pay more attention to composition. It is interesting that although I carry a lot of my lenses in my bag when I put a fixed lens (especially this one) I try to make the most of it instead of putting back my standard zoom (a 24-105).

+1!

Same for me!
 
Upvote 0
wickidwombat said:
KyleSTL said:
Seems like there is a consensus that those who own 200mm f/2L IS lenses are inspired by them. For anyone who wants inspiration (and doesn't mind owning a lens that is in less-than-pristine condition), it is available in 7/10 condition at lensrentals for $4400 shipped:

http://www.lensrentals.com/buy/canon/canon-200mm-f2l-is-serial-number-13206

thanks for the heads up! now to convince them to send it to australia! last time they said they wont sell to oz :(
They likely would, if you sent them cash via Western Union. However, my experience with shipping things Internationally, is that they get beat up badly, and, its expensive. I'd send it in a wooden crate or box with lots of padding, at least 4 inches on all sides. But, shipping might then cost more than the lens.
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
wickidwombat said:
KyleSTL said:
Seems like there is a consensus that those who own 200mm f/2L IS lenses are inspired by them. For anyone who wants inspiration (and doesn't mind owning a lens that is in less-than-pristine condition), it is available in 7/10 condition at lensrentals for $4400 shipped:

http://www.lensrentals.com/buy/canon/canon-200mm-f2l-is-serial-number-13206

thanks for the heads up! now to convince them to send it to australia! last time they said they wont sell to oz :(
They likely would, if you sent them cash via Western Union. However, my experience with shipping things Internationally, is that they get beat up badly, and, its expensive. I'd send it in a wooden crate or box with lots of padding, at least 4 inches on all sides. But, shipping might then cost more than the lens.
I checked its 200 bucks for fedex which is pretty decent
 
Upvote 0
After coming close to selling my Sigma 50mm f/1.4 I've rediscovered a great lens when it's hooked up to the 5DIII. Performance on the 1D Mk4 was patchy to say the least, inconsistent AF accuracy made it a non-starter for commercial work. It was gathering dust in the store room...

But on the 5DIII with its frankly astounding AF has brought this great lens back into the fold. Any shot where I have not nailed focus is user-error rather than any issue with the lens. I'm inspired! It's fun. On the strength of this I may well take a fresh look at the Sigma 85mm f/1.4.

Wickidwombat, you may just have worn me down with your consistant enthusiasm for the Sigma 85. Where did you get yours?

PW
 
Upvote 0
pwp said:
After coming close to selling my Sigma 50mm f/1.4 I've rediscovered a great lens when it's hooked up to the 5DIII. Performance on the 1D Mk4 was patchy to say the least, inconsistent AF accuracy made it a non-starter for commercial work. It was gathering dust in the store room...

But on the 5DIII with its frankly astounding AF has brought this great lens back into the fold. Any shot where I have not nailed focus is user-error rather than any issue with the lens. I'm inspired! It's fun. On the strength of this I may well take a fresh look at the Sigma 85mm f/1.4.

Wickidwombat, you may just have worn me down with your consistant enthusiasm for the Sigma 85. Where did you get yours?

PW
I bought mine local at a bricks and mortar store which is good considering I had to send it in for focus calibration but since then its been good as gold they are under $900 now which is a good deal considering how good they are I just got a 50 1.4 the new one its good too not as good as the 85 but much better than the canon 1.4
 
Upvote 0
Canon 70-200 2.8 mk2 and sigma 85 1.4. The siggy is pretty well built, focus speed is ok but nothing special, never take it out in the rain either. But....the bokeh is amazing, it's pin sharp even at 1.4 it's excellent. You get very very creative blowing foreground and backgrounds.

The Canon? Well what can I say. I took it out yesterday for its first outing. It was attached to a 1d4. It's built like a tank but from the outside looks identical to the old one. Focus speed was immediate on the 4, never used a lens this quick. The sharpness is utterly amazing, even wide open. Then the heavens opened. I'm talking monsoon like rain. All the other photographers with none pro bodies, dozens of em, scurried of to find cover and watch one lone wet photographer standing in the street with a long white lens. Very funny. The 200 never missed a beat. It got drenched for an hour and worked perfectly. So I tested the claimed four stops. Well. I took some shots, hand held 200 mm at a 60th in the rain and got a lot of keepers.

One amazing lens.

Mick
 
Upvote 0
1- 50L f1.2
2- 85L f1.2 II
3- 70-200L f2.8 IS II

This may surprise many but my favorite is by far the 50 1.2. At least this is the one I use the most for indoor shooting. I shoot both Canon and Nikon now, but I find there is no NIkon equivalent to the first two above. The two f1.2 from Canon are in a class of their own...
 
Upvote 0
pwp said:
But on the 5DIII with its frankly astounding AF has brought this great lens back into the fold. Any shot where I have not nailed focus is user-error rather than any issue with the lens. I'm inspired! It's fun. On the strength of this I may well take a fresh look at the Sigma 85mm f/1.4.
PW

I sold my Sigma 50mm 1.4 after having too much AF frustration on 5D Mk II. I'm glad to hear that it performs much better on the MK III. I may have to give it another look.

I LOVE my Sigma 85mm 1.4. The design is similar to their 50 1.4 which means that the focusing barrel is enclosed when a filter is attached. I previously owned the Canon 1.2 L II and found the gap between the focusing barrel and the main lens alarming. The AF on the 85 is much better than the Canon and better than the Sigma 50 by far. You will not regret buying this lens. So sharp, and so much color and contrast. I bought mine from Abe's of Maine.
 
Upvote 0
RLPhoto said:
A lens that inspires? Err, I think photographers use a lens to get what they inspired in their brains. :-X

+1...i look at other peoples pix for inspiration and if need be get/rent a lens to get the effect. I really like my tse24 and 8-16 sigma tho
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.