The Rf 100 f2.8 Macro lens Is their been any news on it Coming out I was hopping it would make an appearance before the season starts in the uk ?
What's wrong with the EF version? I'm using it on the R5. Performs great, and the ergonomics are very good with the extender. AF excellent. Sharpness fine too!The Rf 100 f2.8 Macro lens Is their been any news on it Coming out I was hopping it would make an appearance before the season starts in the uk ?
Not so satisfied with mine (relatively speaking).What's wrong with the EF version? I'm using it on the R5. Performs great, and the ergonomics are very good with the extender. AF excellent. Sharpness fine too!
I use mine for macro and occasionally very tight portraits emphasizing eyes. Never even thought about landscape!Not so satisfied with mine (relatively speaking).
Macro sharpness superb, landscape sharpness (sides and corners) good...
Yes, I know, it's a macro...
Help with the notation. Does 2:1 mean twice the magnification or half of 1:1? I would understand the relative appeal if double, and wonder about it if only half.My EF 100L works fine on my R5, but I'd certainly look at a RF 100mm 2:1 as rumored. My limited experience with my RF lenses has been very good. I only have two consumer RF lenses because I kept all of my EF "L" lenses. I'd prefer a 150-200mm focal length to go with a 2:1 lens but a 100mm would still be worth considering if it had that higher magnification.
Help with the notation. Does 2:1 mean twice the magnification or half of 1:1? I would understand the relative appeal if double, and wonder about it if only half.
I'd expect an RF 100 f/2 macro first. See these rumors:The Rf 100 f2.8 Macro lens Is their been any news on it Coming out I...