neuroanatomist said:
mrzero said:
...there is one major reason that dual slots should be on the 6D line. The built-in GPS makes this a born travel camera. When I am travelling, I don't have the luxury of nightly backups to a laptop or a tablet or whatever. Even if I did, I wouldn't want to spend the time to do it. Consequently, no backups until I get home, and travel photos are almost always once-in-a-lifetime photos.
The most likely reason you'd lose your 'once-in-a-lifetime' travel photos is having your camera stolen...having two cards in your camera won't help. Take the time to backup nightly, or risk the consequences.
Jeesh!
This person straight up said they don't have the luxury to do backups and if they did, they wouldn't want to spend the time for it on their vacation - yet, they are still told "do a backup at night" all in an effort to hound those people who express the value of dual card slot and who have the audacity to voice it.
Theft can and does happen. This has been used as some kind of bizarre argument against dual slots in that "nothing you do is 100%" ...which is nonsense of course. Having a single card is even more vulnerable IN ALL SCENARIOS. If you can take that single card out of the camera and keep it on your person, then theft is taken care of. But you can do that with a dual card strategy also - except now you not only protect against theft, but you also protect against card failure which isn't common - but it isn't as uncommon as some make it out to be.
In my view, if Canon would just offer this simple feature - they would greatly simplify data protection for so many users out there.
How much does a back up hard drive cost? Maybe I don't want to lug around a laptop or other computing device that can accept an SD card and store my photos while on vacation? What a terrible thing it is to ask that a camera have the ability to record my images to two cards! People are asking for too much!
I don't believe I'm in some minority of thinkers on this. I don't dismiss the idea that there are people out there who could care less - but I believe a lot more do care than not. Now, the question of whether they care enough to not buy the camera is completely different and that argument was illogically attempted in this thread. Obviously, with the success of the 6D, many users were willing to look past this. But I'd bet that the vast majority would not reject having a dual card slot if it was just offered in the original 6D. If Canon just said "here you go, two SD" would there even be any threads or posts in opposition to it - people lamenting and wishing it wasn't there? I think we know the answer to that.
Then why do some people just insist on putting up argumentative resistance to the idea that consumers can expect a particular feature on a camera that is offered by others at similar price point? Is it just for the sake of debating on a webforum? Or does it have any sincerity?
How about the Nikonians? Do they show dissatisfaction about having 2 card slots in everything from the D7100, D610 and up?
I think anything over $1,200 should have it. Nikon does. 80D should have it if it ever comes out. This has nothing to do with FF for semi-pro this or that.
Buying a full frame camera for $2,100 without 2 card slots is like buying a BMW without A/C.
Then having some BMW fanatics tell you that you can just roll down the windows on a hot day.
8)