Motion Blur (on purpose) in Sports Photos

Apr 15, 2011
1,356
174
21,163
San Juan, PR
Sometimes I like to slow the shutter way down, and let the subject, or the background, blur. It helps to show the action as it was happening. It's also wicked hard to get just right and very challenging. Have you tried this? What are your experiences

And show off some of your Photos!


Untitled
by RexPhoto91, on Flickr
 
Something different!

Blurred motor-racing photos have become a cliché. I've shot them in the past, but I've switched to a 1950-60s deep-focus fast shutter speed look.

To be noticed you need to be different from the crowd, not copying the present trends. And your pitcher is definitely different, the elongated left arm is eye catching. Keep working on this style.

For me, the background is too soft. There is too little contrast between the out-of-focus background and the blurred pitcher, i.e. too much mush. With the slow shutter speed you should be able to stop-down more than you have. I may be wrong, but it's worth trying.
 
Upvote 0
I wouldnt call these "showing off" my photos, but I dont have many with motion blur. These are some casual shots of some friends back-yard dirt racing, but a quick thundershower made it slick, and these guys were SLOW. The first shot is 1/60th and the second is 1/30th, any faster than 1/60th and it looked like a bunch of parked junkers haha. I should have brought my ND filter to get the DOF a little shallower
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3086.jpg
    IMG_3086.jpg
    806.9 KB · Views: 323
  • IMG_3044.jpg
    IMG_3044.jpg
    803.1 KB · Views: 302
Upvote 0
I get what you mean ie not panning shots as such but just capturing the motion blur of the subject. I tried it recently at a tennis tournament but the keeper rate isn't very high. The second shot is a panning shot which I'm more used to:)
 

Attachments

  • Kooyong Classic (24 of 95).jpg
    Kooyong Classic (24 of 95).jpg
    913.8 KB · Views: 285
  • Williamstown Athletics (133 of 166).jpg
    Williamstown Athletics (133 of 166).jpg
    126.8 KB · Views: 276
Upvote 0
Here's one I took... this was the first time I shot hockey... again... didn't go well... not awful, but nothing something I would be proud of.


This shot was with a wireless shutter release, a monopod with chicken feet that I balanced perfectly to remove movement (as much as one can with a freaking monopod), f/7.1, 1/4 second shutter, iso 100, and ignore the big copyright... I didn't feel like going into lightroom to remove it...
 

Attachments

  • _96A4693.jpg
    _96A4693.jpg
    3.4 MB · Views: 290
Upvote 0
occasionally it works for me to view as long as its subtle and functional. Its really difficult to do, I've only seen a very few images that impressed me, and I am a total failure at producing anything I like. A lot of it is personal opinion and preference.

Sometimes, like last week, there was not enough light, so I had a shutter speed that was not fast enough. However, I was not trying to show a blur

jeyre--8363-X2.jpg




jeyre--8483-XL.jpg



jeyre--8494-XL.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
... and I am a total failure at producing anything I like.

I'm so in the same boat. SS self loathing... maybe not loathing... but maybe a general distaste. When something comes out really well, I love it for 6 months and then I think... why did I like that so much... damn law of diminishing returns.
 
Upvote 0
After developing a successful technique to do stop-motion images of butterflies in free flight I'm working up a similar technique to those described in this thread to give a better impression of butterflies in free flight. Attached are a couple of examples of the work in progress. The Zebra Heliconian image was taken at ISO 200, 1/60 sec. f/16. The image of the Giant Swallowtail was taken at ISO 2000, 1/160 sec., f/32.
 

Attachments

  • Zebra_1DX_37422_Ltr_BFIF.JPG
    Zebra_1DX_37422_Ltr_BFIF.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 271
  • Giant_1DX_36393_Ltr_BFIF.JPG
    Giant_1DX_36393_Ltr_BFIF.JPG
    247.9 KB · Views: 217
Upvote 0