Just for fun I added a poll to see what the major coconscious is. If I missed it please just not the lens.
Upvote
0
dstppy said:KKCFamilyman said:kirillica said:It depends on size of indoor. If it's not enough room, then 24-70 (I or II), if you have enough place in there - 70-200 F2.8 (II in case of IS)
I checked with my 24-105 this morning and it seems as though the 24-70 range for me will be my more used indoor simply because of room. I am debating on returning the f4 70-200 for the 2.8 but not really sure the added weight is worth the extra $1k and to only gain a stop still will require fill flash to me. I do not find myself using the 50mm simply because with kids it can be hard sometimes not being able to zoom in or out plus the more light the less my twins are in focus so thats why I am having a hard time finding the best way to approach most shooting environments knowing I cannot get them all. I did great birthday portraits with it at 2.8 but there was plenty of ambient light in the room. Basically what is everyones go to suggestion for christmas morning? Should i get the 600ex and go that route?
The Tamron SP 24-70mm Di VC USD is also a really competent contender . . . Christmas morning and flashes don't go together at my house
Menace said:My 2 cents worth...
Sell 24-105L and replace it with the new 24-70L II as you'll gain an extra stop.
Although you just bought the 70-200 f4 IS, if you can exchange it for the 2.8 IS (v2 if you an afford it and weight is not a big issue) - meaning you'll have constant 2.8 aperture all the way from 24-200!
Still keep 50 1.4 for very low light.
Hope this helps. Let us know what you think.
Cheers
Menace said:My 2 cents worth...
Sell 24-105L and replace it with the new 24-70L II as you'll gain an extra stop.
Although you just bought the 70-200 f4 IS, if you can exchange it for the 2.8 IS (v2 if you an afford it and weight is not a big issue) - meaning you'll have constant 2.8 aperture all the way from 24-200!
Still keep 50 1.4 for very low light.
Hope this helps. Let us know what you think.
Cheers
pwp said:Keep your current excellent glass and get a 600 EX-RT and learn to use it properly.
Badly used flash is appalling, used skilfully you'd barely know it was there....it's the photographers friend.
Skilfully bounce flash should look indistinguishable from natural light.
-PW
IIIHobbs said:How did your Disney photos turn out?
IIIHobbs said:How did your Disney photos turn out?
ishdakuteb said:Menace said:My 2 cents worth...
Sell 24-105L and replace it with the new 24-70L II as you'll gain an extra stop.
Although you just bought the 70-200 f4 IS, if you can exchange it for the 2.8 IS (v2 if you an afford it and weight is not a big issue) - meaning you'll have constant 2.8 aperture all the way from 24-200!
Still keep 50 1.4 for very low light.
Hope this helps. Let us know what you think.
Cheers
yep, you gain extra stop in aperture, but you will lose 3 tops of IS which means you have the ability to go lower than 1/24. in theory, you should not go below 1/24 with 24-70mm lens, but you can do it with 24-105mm since the lens support 3 stops in IS. however, with 5d mark III in low light, one would not care that much since 5d mark III's ISO is soooo good unless 25,600 or 51,200 (worse case) is not enough for you![]()
agierke said:i agree with the notion that a 600EX would get you the most functionality for your dollar with the parameters you stated. replacing the 24-105 or the 70-200 would be nice (both replacements suggested would show improvements but it would be nominal) but the cost to do so would be far greater.
if you simply had to get an additional lens i think the 35mm F1.4L would offer the most benefit to your existing kit. that lens is simply an All-Star in canons line up. can be tricky to use with moving subjects wide open, but well worth it if you have the patience to learn to use it.
back to a speedlight....
+100 to the idea of properly using bounced light for low light situations. i would even suggest that you get a radio trigger system to plug into the speedlight so that you can use the flash off the camera. i attach AB CSRBs to my flashes and trigger them remotely with the CSTs. this would allow you to place the flash anywhere in the room (bounce off the ceiling) and effectively raise the light level of the room in a more natural way.
600EX + CSRB/CST combo would run you @ 725.00 and increase the functionality of ALL your existing lenses (and any future lenses you purchased). keep in mind you would also need to buy a hot shoe adapter (15.00) to attach to the bottom of the speed light so you can plug in the CSRB.
KKCFamilyman said:I ended up getting the 70-200 2.8. I plan on getting a speed lite next (600 ex). I posted an example of a christmas shot I hope to improve.
Dylan777 said:KKCFamilyman said:I ended up getting the 70-200 2.8. I plan on getting a speed lite next (600 ex). I posted an example of a christmas shot I hope to improve.
I hate to say "I told you" on 70-200 f2.8 IS II, before your vacation.
Now I'm telling you AGAIN, sell your 24-105 and get 24-70 mrk II.