swiftrandomness94 said:
Do people on websites just do this for hopeful popularity? Seriously, a review isn't a review if you are doing that and elaborating like 'Yea, i think this will be great because blah blah blah. It really is remarkable blah blah blah'. So it's basically a list of specs and dragging things out to sound sooooo sophisticated. Mislabeling for attention is really stupid.
Here's an example, 14:36 of
Tony Northrup clickbait on youtube about the Pentax 645Z.
Don't click that link unless you really need to see a good example of a bad example.
The Z has popped up on my seriously contemplating radar, but boy and howdy it's a lot of money. Naturally I want to see every review I can find, I figured that with sand in my shoes, I'd even watch T.N..
He doesn't even have a camera. What of that review I did watch consists of his impressions of what the Z might be about. You get to see lots of TN in front of the video lens, live screen shots of a Z on his PC screen, watch as TN flips through a catalog.
The guy seems to really like talking in front of a camera.
This one is so much not about the Z but about TN, he didn't even include any shots of his wife.