• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

New Samyang 12mm f2 for EOS-M

oh that's really cool, I didn't realize 3rd party have started to embrace the M mount!

However, I'm not sure why I would prefer this over Canon's excellent 11-22 IS zoom?

I prefer IS over fast aperture for UWA any day, and AF is just really nice to have, not to mention a convenient range of focal lengths in one lens.

Granted the OEM option likely costs 50%-100% more...
 
Upvote 0
BL said:
oh that's really cool, I didn't realize 3rd party have started to embrace the M mount!

However, I'm not sure why I would prefer this over Canon's excellent 11-22 IS zoom?

I prefer IS over fast aperture for UWA any day, and AF is just really nice to have, not to mention a convenient range of focal lengths in one lens.

Granted the OEM option likely costs 50%-100% more...

+1....16-35 III with IS would be nice ;)
 
Upvote 0
I bought this little lens for my Sony NEX because I just had to have it as a tiny WA option :). The lens is built like a tiny tank and is a useful small prime wide angle that handles very well on the NEX. The focus ring is very tight but I found it to be an asset because due to the high DOF you can set focus to the hyperfocal distance and be done with it; you then only need to adjust focus again if the subject distance changes drastically.

There is some chromatic aberration but that's easily corrected in post. I didn't encounter any issues with distortion and think it can get by without any correction unless in the most critical of application. Overall I'm very pleased, and I didn't encounter any of the yellowish patches mentioned in the Fuji review.

Here are a few CA corrected sample shots from my NEX-6 (1.5x crop). Most of these were shot at f/5.6 and they were processed in Adobe Lightroom. Sorry they're not from an EOS-M ;)
 

Attachments

  • 2014_05_03_0039.jpg
    2014_05_03_0039.jpg
    288.3 KB · Views: 475
  • 2014_05_03_0038.jpg
    2014_05_03_0038.jpg
    323.8 KB · Views: 870
  • 2014_05_03_0026.jpg
    2014_05_03_0026.jpg
    335.8 KB · Views: 502
  • 2014_05_03_0021.jpg
    2014_05_03_0021.jpg
    183.8 KB · Views: 479
Upvote 0