File under ree-diculous:
https://petapixel.com/2018/07/30/this-is-a-paper-mockup-of-the-nikon-full-frame-mirrorless-camera/
- A
https://petapixel.com/2018/07/30/this-is-a-paper-mockup-of-the-nikon-full-frame-mirrorless-camera/
- A
Nikon users
I think it's fun. I post PS-hacked-together superposition comparisons all the time.
But without comparison to another body side by side, it's hard to peg how big this thing really is. Looks like a stout enough grip, but I wonder if it's too close to the lens mount like the A7/A9 bodies are.
- A
There''s a whole pile of new size comparison images on NR now:
https://nikonrumors.com/2018/08/02/...-comparisons-based-on-the-latest-teaser.aspx/
here's dimensions based on hot shoe. Image is from article linked above.
Looks like there's a good size grip and enough clearance for banana fingers.
Wow. That's a committed level of interest, people. Thanks for the forward, Aglet.
So why go that much bigger than the FF required 43mm image circle? They aren't going medium format big with the sensor, so is the added real estate just for larger aperture glass to have to physical room to control/capture/protect a large rear element?
Or are they pulling some nuts APS-H but in reverse (i.e. slightly larger than FF)... for what? What upside could possibly be worth the staggering additional cost a one-off sized sensor would run them?
- A