Patent: Canon RF 135mm f/1.4L USM

Canon Rumors Guy

EOS-1D X Mark III
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
9,581
2,261
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Well here’s a fun optical formula from Canon discovered by Canon News, a Canon RF 135mm f/1.4L USM.  The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM is an all-time classic, and this would certainly be an amazing offering worth of the new lens mount.
I think there is a higher than normal probability that such a lens design will make it into a consumer product.
Canon RF  135mm f/1.4L USM:

Focal length: 131.00mm
F-Number: 1.41
Half angle of view: 9.38°
Image height: 21.64mm
Total lens length:  182.28mm
BF: 13.87mm

Continue reading...
 
Last edited:

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,769
4,195
The Ozarks
Be still my beating heart! If this comes to fruition I will be one very happy guy! Please Canon. Please! A native f/2 would be fine, f/1.4 would be sublime. Wondering what the front filter thread size would be. 105mm+?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

Besisika

How can you stand out, if you do like evrybdy else
Mar 25, 2014
762
189
Montreal
Be still my beating heart! If this comes to fruition I will be one very happy guy! Please Canon. Please! A native f/2 would be fine, f/1.4 would be sublime.
That would peak the chatter high. With eye focus on the EOS-R lineup, I would shoot 135 at 1.4 more often than needed. The image will be one of a kind. RF lenses seem to be smaller than the EF anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,769
4,195
The Ozarks
That would peak the chatter high. With eye focus on the EOS-R lineup, I would shoot 135 at 1.4 more often than needed. The image will be one of a kind. RF lenses seem to be smaller than the EF anyway.
I don't know which RF lenses you are talking about being smaller (70-200?), but every RF lens I have is a monster compared to EF. However, I like that. ;)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

Stuart

Hi, Welcome from an ePhotozine fan, & 6D user.
Jul 22, 2010
390
128
London & Woking
www.ephotozine.com
Wow, a classic lens where the new version could also be an instant classic.

" consumer product " but business landing price. Would LOVE to see images taken by this presently hypothetical lens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

jdavidse

R5
CR Pro
Sep 13, 2012
120
144
The difference between this lens and a 1.8 or 2.0 will be $5,000 and triple the weight. Assuming we only get 1 L lens at this focal length, I would be happy to see this lens never get made, because I would really like a compact and fast 135 L lens
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Romain

Click by chance, everyday...
Dec 20, 2016
27
28
Lens length: 2km Lens hood: 1km Total length: 3km Weight: an elephant!.. Price: 4500$... lol ... Even with this specs it will be an instant buy! (after 10 years of savings haha...) I hope this dream lens will come true! :love:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

StoicalEtcher

EOS RP
CR Pro
Jan 3, 2018
417
358
Yorkshire
Hmmn, I expect this would be an amazing lens - and probably render some amazing shots.

However..... what I like about the existing (EF)135/2 is that it is also a pretty unobtrusive little tool, which gives great results but doesn't draw any attention at all. I can't help feeling that at 135/1.4, it will be a different kettle of fish - "great", but you won't be going around subtly with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

privatebydesign

I post too Much on Here!!
CR Pro
Jan 29, 2011
10,673
6,112
The difference between this lens and a 1.8 or 2.0 will be $5,000 and triple the weight. Assuming we only get 1 L lens at this focal length, I would be happy to see this lens never get made, because I would really like a compact and fast 135 L lens
I disagree, a 135mm f1.4 need only have a 95mm front element, it’s not crazy like the larger than 100mm front elements on all the big whites. A 135mm f1.8 need only have a 75mm front element, or a 77mm filter thread.

Indeed the RF 28-70mm f2 has a 95mm front thread and is $3,000, I’d expect a 135mm f1.4 to be mechanically simpler, a similar size, lighter, and less costly. I’d guesstimate the $2,499 prince point. A 135mm f1.8 should be considerably cheaper than that, probably sub $2,000.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

privatebydesign

I post too Much on Here!!
CR Pro
Jan 29, 2011
10,673
6,112
This plus a sports worthy R-series body would likely be enough to bring me back to Canon. I would fully expect this lens to be in the $6-8K range though.
Why? That doesn’t make any sense or correlate with similar sized glass Canon already make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,769
4,195
The Ozarks
I disagree, a 135mm f1.4 need only have a 95mm front element, it’s not crazy like the larger than 100mm front elements on all the big whites. A 135mm f1.8 need only have a 75mm front element, or a 77mm filter thread.

Indeed the RF 28-70mm f2 has a 95mm front thread and is $3,000, I’d expect a 135mm f1.4 to be mechanically simpler, a similar size, lighter, and less costly. I’d guesstimate the $2,499 prince point. A 135mm f1.8 should be considerably cheaper than that, probably sub $2,000.
You only make my heart pump harder. ;) People seem to forget the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 and the price isn't out of line at $1,599. For a Canon? Anywhere from $2,699 - $4,000 would be fine with me. Can't take it with me. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

IcyBergs

I have a Sony...TV
May 31, 2016
132
284
This sounds like a perfect lens for indoor portraits where you absolutely can't have more than one eyelash in focus.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
CR Pro
Nov 7, 2013
4,087
4,585
Germany
Does it come with a free trail for the gym ;)
Weight lifting might be recommendable :ROFLMAO:

Filter size about 95 to 105 mm, lenght 162,2 mm, approx. weight 1,5 kg +
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Del Paso

M3 Singlestroke
CR Pro
Aug 9, 2018
1,811
2,110
:cry: :cry: :cry: Bad news (no cash left !)
But I must get one, no matter how...:devilish:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users