Tugela said:They don't have ownership however, but that in itself is not actionable
My reading is that they were asserting copyright. And threatening action based on a legal right that they do not have. I would say that is either fraud or obtaining money with menaces.
They deserve to be sued.
Tugela said:So basically an administrative error on their part, since that would not have been appropriate for these particular images.
IMO, it goes beyond an 'administrative error' - it seems that this has happened repeatedly so if they have not learnt they should do so pretty quickly. They are doing it because they think they can.
Upvote
0