From my point of view, the main comments were about the excellent still image quality, noise-free jpegs from ISO 50 - 6400, and the ability to AF in 'near darkness'.
Otherwise, it's a preview of what most of the reviews are going to say: interesting, good new lenses, no IBIS, one card, cropped video, weird multi-fn bar, not as well spec'd as the Sony, not as 'professional' as the Z7, gee it'll be great to see what the next iteration looks like.
This is at least the second review that states that the EOS-R has no AA filter - this is not correct, isn't it ?
("Behind that cover lies a 30.3 megapixel CMOS sensor without an optical low-pass filter. "
https://www.techradar.com/reviews/canon-eos-r-review also state's : "The EOS R uses a full-frame 30.3MP sensor without an optical low-pass filter. If that sounds familiar it's because Canon's EOS 5D Mark IV DSLR shares the same pixel count, although Canon stresses this isn't the same sensor. "
Are they all (wrongly) copy each other or did i miss something ?