No progress along the lines of the R50 V??? No compact milc whatsoever? That's a very dark future.
It's hard not to be an **** and start dropping whishlists, but whatever...
- The predicted 300-600/5.6 sounds great, I'm in.
- 70-300/4L (80-300 or whatever) optimized for travel (weight and size). The 100-500 is a brilliant lens and a great upgrade after the EF 100-400 II (which was already great), but still too heavy. The 70-200/4 is also brilliant but 200mm is often not enough. The 70-200/2.8 does not accept 1.4X.
- _Great_, non-L 28mm and 50mm lens. (No, the 45/1.2 does not qualify, having the usual STM motor...and I'd also choose 55mm instead of 45mm if not 50mm)
- The predicted 28-70/2 mk2. I'm in! Just make it lighter and better balanced.
- Actually, a non-L 28-70/2 (or 28-55/2 or actually anything between 28-70/2 and 30-50/2) would kick ass. For me at least.
- An awesome macro lens. Let's say 150/2 with 1.5x max magnification.
- An awesome tele zoom to match the (hopefully mk2) 28-70 and to answer Sony's 50-150/2.
- Fullframe compact milc. Come ooooon!
*In general, better AF for non-L lenses. Make that STM better or invent something new, or introduce mid-tier lenses which are non-L but incorporate nano-USM. Just do something
I promise to buy each and every piece of the above, should Canon come up with any of them.
