There's not enough "prime vs zoom" threads so what's your thoughts on a Canon 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 II, lets say, vs a Canon 70-200 2.8 non-IS (on full frame if that matters)? And then, consequently, your thoughts on the 70-200 2.8 image quality vs that of the 70-200 2.8 IS II with the IS turned off.
:-\
:-\