Recommendations for portrait cropping

One of the nice things about art is that there are no rules. Just opinions that people try to sell as rules.

They say that the "Eyes Are the Window to the Soul," so I like the motion picture Extreme Close Up (ECU) cutting off the chin and the top of the head http://www.getmann.com/2010/08/26/Movie_Review__Fistful_of_Dynamite_Duck_You_Sucker.html

50+ Wonderful Examples of Classic Photography Portraits http://inspiringmesh.com/50-wonderful-examples-of-classic-photography-portraits/ Please note the #3 "Gone" violates the the suggestion of thirds ;)

10 More Tips for Stunning Portrait Photography http://digital-photography-school.com/tips-portrait-photography/

Do something different. Wideangle portraits http://www.phototechnique.com/portrait/wideangle-portraits/ and Wide angle portraits: how to use your wide-angle lens to caricature your friends http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2013/03/21/wide-angle-portraits-how-to-use-your-wide-angle-lens-to-caricature-your-friends/

Also check-out Stunningly And Incredibly Realistic Pencil Portraits http://www.pouted.com/stunningly-incredibly-realistic-pencil-portraits/#sthash.Z3CUtiPD.dpuf
 
Upvote 0
c.d.embrey said:
One of the nice things about art is that there are no rules. Just opinions that people try to sell as rules.
I both agree and disagree on this one - there are no rules, but there are some guidelines like the ones Phil posted that certainly make a portrait look better. For example, cropping at the wrist, knee, or ankle joints may not break any rules, but it's not going to make for a pretty portrait.
 
Upvote 0
mackguyver said:
c.d.embrey said:
One of the nice things about art is that there are no rules. Just opinions that people try to sell as rules.
I both agree and disagree on this one - there are no rules, but there are some guidelines like the ones Phil posted that certainly make a portrait look better. For example, cropping at the wrist, knee, or ankle joints may not break any rules, but it's not going to make for a pretty portrait.
I agree. I think it's a good guideline to follow "rules" within a range of scale. The range will encompass 2 or 3 different zones of wildness, risk and craziness, green, yellow and red. The further out you go on the scale, the more risky (and perhaps more fun) your shots become. In other words, do "establishment (by the rules)" shots first and then branch out and try more risky and unorthodox things to get unique and inventive results. That way, you can please everyone, the client, your own art needs and whatever may be in between. You also learn more this way! So shoot a few good basic shots, then start getting tighter or wider, tilt the camera, have the subject jump, get wacky, etc.

One example, I tell small groups to get ready, be silly, etc and fire off a few shots before they are ready and this often makes them laugh and I fire off more shots. Which makes them laugh more. Then I get serious, they stiffen up, we shoot more (insurance shots) and then I ask them to loosen up and I shoot more. Funny faces! Have fun! When I'm done, my goal is to have about 15+ shots, 3 or 4 of which might be worth keeping and hopefully will be different from one another.

Another thing to remember with portraits, esp one on one shoots is to put your subject at ease. Don't start shooting until they (and you) are relaxed and comfortable. This may take 30 seconds or 30 minutes. But the great photographers out there that make legendary photos of big celebrities, etc do exactly that. They make it a point to get to know and become comfortable with the subject before they start shooting, even if all they are looking for is one good shot to have at the end.
 
Upvote 0
RustyTheGeek said:
mackguyver said:
c.d.embrey said:
One of the nice things about art is that there are no rules. Just opinions that people try to sell as rules.
I both agree and disagree on this one - there are no rules, but there are some guidelines like the ones Phil posted that certainly make a portrait look better. For example, cropping at the wrist, knee, or ankle joints may not break any rules, but it's not going to make for a pretty portrait.
I agree. I think it's a good guideline to follow "rules" within a range of scale.

If you want your portraits to look like everyone's, then follow the rules. If you want to standout, then pay no attention to the rules.

Here are a few well known photographers work. Non of it is conventional. And some not safe for work.

Hedi Slimane http://www.22h22.org/2011/01/18/robert-de-niro-x-hedi-slimane-photos/ No three-point lighting set-ups here.

Richard Avedon http://maryckhayes.wordpress.com/2012/08/31/simply-stunning-richard-avedons-portraits/ You won't find poses like these in any posing guide.

Juergen Teller http://www.carteblanche-x.com/blog/2013/01/22/this-years-brightest-stars-by-juergen-teller-for-w-magazine/ Horror of horrors, he uses on-camera-flash :eek:

Mark Seliger has well over 100 Rolling Stone covers. http://atchuup.com/portraits-of-celebrities/ Do you have a portrait of President Obama back in your portfolio ???
 
Upvote 0