paul13walnut5 said:Ah boys and their locker rooms.
Any fule nose, it's not what you've got, it whats you do with it, and if your partner can get some satisfaction from it too, thats a bonus.
Whatever the biggest number is, I've spent $100 more.
Do I win?
paul13walnut5 said:Ah boys and their locker rooms.
Any fule nose, it's not what you've got, it whats you do with it, and if your partner can get some satisfaction from it too, thats a bonus.
Whatever the biggest number is, I've spent $100 more.
Do I win?
bdunbar79 said:Whatever the biggest number is, I've spent $100 more.
Only if you've spent the extra $100 on a good liquor selection.
2012, bought: 28-300L, 1D X, 600/4L IS II, both MkIII extenders, 600EX-RT, and $4.5K worth of RRS support gear. I'm not going to do the math.![]()
M.ST said:I don´t talk about prices because cameras and lenses are only tools for my work.
If someone spend a lot of money for a 5D Mark III with the EF 24-70 2.8 II lens for private use than it´s a very big investment compared to my investment for professional use.
neuroanatomist said:M.ST said:If someone spend a lot of money for a 5D Mark III with the EF 24-70 2.8 II lens for private use than it´s a very big investment compared to my investment for professional use.
True...it's all relative. I spend a lot on camera gear for personal use, but the sum total of all my camera gear is less than the cost of the microscope in my office...and that one is cheap compared the scopes in my labs (even the cameras attached to them cost $10-$20K each, and some scopes have up to 4 cameras mounted). A few thousand in camera gear at home...a few million in optical gear for professional use. All relative.