Discuss the review of the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II here.
Canon Rumors said:Discuss the review of the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II here.
If they made a 135mm f/1.8 IS, I'd lose complete interest in this lens. Until then, I continue to weight the value of this lens in my work.
Robert Welch said:I have the first version of this lens and am very happy with it. One knock I've seen commented on about the mkII is the bokeh is a bit more 'nervous' as compared to the first version. Not to say it's bad, but just not as 'creamy' as the original version. Aside from the cost to upgrade, this one quality is of concern to me in contemplating an upgrade. Can anyone comment on this comparison, is it fair to say the mkII isn't quite as nice in this one respect as compared to the original 70-200/2.8 IS?
Do you care about IQ?Dylan777 said:Without reading the review, just give me this lens and 24-70 f2.8 II on FF...........I'm done :-X
No need to carry: 24L, 35L, 50L, 85L, 135L, and 200L