Review of the Fotodiox WonderPana filter system for Tamron 15-30 VC.

Thanks, lovely shots!

I use the Wonderpana system for my TS-E 17/4L, and I'm quite pleased with it (although the holder is the size of a salad bowl, but you cann'a change the laws of physics).
 
Upvote 0
Nice video as well.

Now the $64,000 question: presuming you weren't in love with a bulbous element lens or shooting as wide 15mm, would you still choose the Wonderpana over the Lee setup, and why?

I ask because moving to the 'bigger than 4x6' filter ecosystem increases the size of your gear, limits the breadth of your filter buying options and costs (unless I'm mistaken) a great deal more when you add everything up. Is it worth it to do so (i.e. is it better for your needs than your 4x6 alternatives), or is this just a mandatory price of admission for shooting so wide?

- A
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
Thanks, lovely shots!

I use the Wonderpana system for my TS-E 17/4L, and I'm quite pleased with it (although the holder is the size of a salad bowl, but you cann'a change the laws of physics).

OK, here's a thing even more controversial than the DR debate, it's 'Cannae' incidently, but he actually said "can't" :oo
Bit of a de-rail there ;D
 
Upvote 0
ahsanford said:
or is this just a mandatory price of admission for shooting so wide?

- A

That seems to be the case. The only alternative that I'm aware of at the moment is to shoot the Zeiss 2.8/15mm. It's a fantastic lens, but it's also almost three times the price of the Tamron, and, while it can use traditional filters, it is in a 95mm filter thread. 95mm filters aren't much cheaper than the 145mm filters the WonderPana uses (they are both specialty items). The Tamron gives you the flexibility of the zoom + VC (not to mention AF), and it, combined with the full WonderPana kit (like I used for the review) is still only slightly more than half the price of the Zeiss.

The comparison to LEE is tough. Both are good systems.
 
Upvote 0