Zv said:Great review, thanks! I always enjoy reading them.
On a side note - how do these other so called reviewers not know about the "release shutter without lens" thing by now? It was an issue way back during the very first M so by now it should be common knowledge. A quick google search would easily clear things up. I'm just shaking my head right now! :![]()
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:Zv said:Great review, thanks! I always enjoy reading them.
On a side note - how do these other so called reviewers not know about the "release shutter without lens" thing by now? It was an issue way back during the very first M so by now it should be common knowledge. A quick google search would easily clear things up. I'm just shaking my head right now! :![]()
I agree. I can't tell you how many questions that I get asked, though, that could be easily answered the same way. I guess people are just lazy.
AvTvM said:1) EF-M lens range is excellent. Only a compact short tele - eg EF-M 80/2.4 IS STM - is missing.
2) lenses without AF = no purchase.
Done.
chickenplucker said:I'm really curious how both these lenses would perform if used for astrophotography. That 21mm sounds like a perfect lens for scooping up more light, and Samyangs other primes have always been really good performers for taking wide field shots. PlusiIt did always seem kind of goofy putting their 14mm on my EOSM since the dang lens and EOS adapter weighed twice as much as camera, this would make a much better compact and portable kit.
One Moonlit Night by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr