LensRentals-Drew said:If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask them here or in the comments to the blog post. We are pretty responsive!
-Lensrentals
I'm afraid that Tamron's glass glue isn't going to cut it in many photographers' work environments —bchernicoff said:To me the numbers make a strong argument for the Tamron. People have sworn by the Canon 24-70 Mk I, yet the Tamron beats it in resolution and adds IS.
Mt Spokane Photography said:The Tamron breaking down so early in its life does not bode well for being able to count on it when needed. using three dabs of glue to hold a large diameter element in place is really cutting corners. I'd expect them to be failing in droves before they are a year old, and as the adhesive dries out a little more.
bchernicoff said:
I certainly hope so, but so far, they have been silent. They don't have a good record of acting quickly to such issues. Those who use the lens in temperature extremes where expansion / contraction is prevelant might be affected the most.bchernicoff said:Mt Spokane Photography said:The Tamron breaking down so early in its life does not bode well for being able to count on it when needed. using three dabs of glue to hold a large diameter element in place is really cutting corners. I'd expect them to be failing in droves before they are a year old, and as the adhesive dries out a little more.
I would hope they make a production adjustment to address this.
bchernicoff said:Mt Spokane Photography said:The Tamron breaking down so early in its life does not bode well for being able to count on it when needed. using three dabs of glue to hold a large diameter element in place is really cutting corners. I'd expect them to be failing in droves before they are a year old, and as the adhesive dries out a little more.
I would hope they make a production adjustment to address this.
Axilrod said:Wow those are some seriously impressive results, sharper than the 24 ts-e and the 70-200@70mm?! I expected it o be good but damn that's outstanding.
Ok, barrel distortion increased from 2.15% to 2.45%. The 0.3% increase in distortion isn't going to affect my work too badly.Viggo said:Worse distortion at 24?![]()
Zlatko said:Ok, barrel distortion increased from 2.15% to 2.45%. The 0.3% increase in distortion isn't going to affect my work too badly.Viggo said:Worse distortion at 24?![]()
![]()
It wouldn't be my first choice for architecture, but it's fine for many other subjects. In a design like this, distortion necessarily gets sacrificed in favor of other performance criteria.Viggo said:Yeah, the difference isn't much, but the old one wasn't very good in this respect, so worse is quite bad distortion.
bchernicoff said: