..and a hand-truck to move it around.
That would be a killer street photography lens.
50 f/1.4 (or 55mm or 58mm) which is relatively small and light (ie closer to the size/weight of the EF 50 f/1.4 than the RF 50 f/1.2L) and moderately priced. I don't expect such a lens to be optically as good as the RF 50 f/1.2L, but I'd like it to be a step up from something like the 50 f/1.8 STM (eg in terms of bokeh). If it was f/1.8 rather than f/1.4 I'd still be interested, if size/weight/price are right - and from the rumours it seems that is probably the sort of lens we are likely to get.
nally.
By the time any of these lenses turn up you'd be better off just using the ef40 and adapter or wait for the 50 f2/f1.8 yes i know those ain't pancakes but doubt they will make anything smaller than that for a long time if ever. I'm a big fan of the 40 that's what I'd do.Exactly. The 40 on a little Rebel film body is pretty awesome, on the 6D is pretty awesome. In APS-C land, the 24mm pancake gives almost exactly the same field of view as the 40 on full frame. The 24 on a little rebel SL1, SL2, or SL3 is pretty awesome. Come to think of it, the 22mm EF-M pancake on something like the M5 or M50, or M6MII is also pretty good, though a bit wider field of view.
yes, thats really important. RF 100-500 does really good with autofocus but you simply miss the quality/background blur when you have to crop images for sharing with social communities. Also 100-500 should have been made with F 4.5 to 6.3 atleast.A 200mm-600mm f/5.6 would be pretty awesome and an RF 135 f/2. That's my wish list