SIGMA Announces the 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
Question: Has the new Sigma hypersonic AF motor with 1.3x more torque features in the new 85mm Art shown us the AF issues reported by some users was not software incompatibility but simple underpowered hardware all along?
Will this lens with that new HSM motor be a good focused?
Will this lens with that new HSM motor be a good focused?
Upvote
0
alex_m_is_back said:Alex_M was banned from the forum for offering a "personalised, in person entertainment session" to a forum member that for some strange reason kept insulting him on forum pages. Alex_M asked that forum member very politely to remove the insulting posts from the forum and that was also reported to forum admin. What happened is that, Admin has banned Alex_M from the forum for posting "threatening message". Nice and easy
Apparently, this is how it is. Alex_M sent a message to forum admin and asked to reconsider his decision. No response received so far.
Hope Admin will reinstate you. Alex_M was a nice guy!
Upvote
0
Ah-Keong said:time for Canon to add IS to the 24-70mm f/2,8L III?
:
yes. it will just be called EF 24-70/2.8 L IS ... not "III" ... and yes, by all means, Canon should have added IS already when they launched the current version "II". *stupid* Canon.
let's see how good the new Sigma really is ... and pricing ... and when it will become available ... remember the delays with sigma 24-105/4 Art? ,-)
Upvote
0
Ah-Keong said:AvTvM said:
opps. My bad.
Maybe Canon should look into In-Body-Image-Stabilisation... Like Sony, Olympus, etc etc....
:
also YES! But not for DSLRs - too late, no point any longer. But for a mirrorless FF system Canon should include in-body stabilization.
8)
Upvote
0
Actually maybe Canon did not had the adequate tech or the IS f2.8 mechanism was flawed and they needed time to perfect it.AvTvM said:
Upvote
0
Or it could be that they can pretty much sell the lens range multiple times.AvTvM said:Diko said:
not possible! Canon is innovative, capable and perfect!;D
Upvote
0
it's quite sad, that canon now is the last serious menufacturer, who does not offer a stabilized 24-70 2.8 option.
so far, a crop body with 17-55 2.8 gives camparable low light capability like the 24-(x)xx 4.0 offerings
so far, a crop body with 17-55 2.8 gives camparable low light capability like the 24-(x)xx 4.0 offerings
Upvote
0
In the market for a 24-70 2.8. This new option looks very promising, especially with the addition of the IS.
Upvote
0
Looks good. A stabilized 2.8 24-70 with a zoom ring that turns the right way.
Maybe the next gap for Sigma to fill: 16-35 2.8 OS, so stabilized, accepts filters, less massive than Tamron's 15-30 2.8 VC and also (unlike their 12-24 and Tamron's 15-30), turns the Canon way.
Maybe the next gap for Sigma to fill: 16-35 2.8 OS, so stabilized, accepts filters, less massive than Tamron's 15-30 2.8 VC and also (unlike their 12-24 and Tamron's 15-30), turns the Canon way.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
