You compared medium format vs a 1" sensor saying the photos will look the same, which is hogwash. Honestly you'd have to be an extremely inexperienced or just straight-up bad photographer to not be able to take advantage of the benefits of medium format in that situation. The images are going to look wildly different.
And you mate should have to be an extremely inexperienced English speaker, or just a straight-up bad photographer, because you couldn't read entirely, and understand, what I wrote.
I'll quote myself: regarding comparison between MF, FF and 1" sensor using the same exposure triangle,
"our pictures will look (almost) exactly the same in terms of brightness"
IN
TERMS
OF
BRIGHTNESS
Now, if your English is at least decent, and your IQ is not as low as you made me suspect it is, try to read once again the sentence, and reconsider your post.
Of course FF and MF will look WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY better then and Aps or a 1" sensor, because we're in a damn church with low light and we're 3200, 6400, 12.800 iso, well yes, the 1" would be totally unusable, and the Aps almost as unusable.
But we were NOT discussing dynamic range or low light performance across sensors; we were discussing that,
GIVEN THE EXACTLY SAME EXPOSURE TRIANGLE (LET'S SUPPOSE F2 1/200S 3200ISO), ALL CAMERAS, FROM A PHONE TO A MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA, WILL PRODUCE A FILE WITH THE SAME EXACT BRIGHTNESS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR SENSOR SIZE, because the guy I end up blocking was arguing that a sensor receives different amount of light (for the same exposure triangle) when considering different sensor size,
AND THAT'S NOT IT, the EV (Exposure Value) of a scene is the same regardless of the device used to record it, and every device when you insert a specific EV (which correspond to an exposure triangle that gives the same results of the specific EV) gives you back a file with the same brightness, because EV is a definite standard, a scene with 8EV has a certain std brightness and a 15EV scene also has its own specific std brightness.
If you guys just knew what an incident light exposure meter it is, and how to use it (maybe choosing the EV view, instead of the exposure triangle view), that would be crystal clear; so man, believe me, I'm not the straight-up bad photographer here.
I started in 1999 with 35mm film cameras, then went to 6x6 film cameras, I used in training large format film cameras (but I admit I totally suck with Scheimpflug; but you probably don't even know what I'm talking about), and just then went to digital; did you ever shoot a roll of film? Maybe a roll of 6x6/6x9? Did you ever used large format? Ever shoot not just negative, but also slides?
Bah.