moreorless said:
This is really exactly the kind of post the OP was talking about, someone making a person judgement that is not shared by many others and talking it up as a stone cold fact.
Aside from assuming that Canon fudged up their marketing and approach to the 5D3, what else is a judgment?
- It's a fact that the d300 is a higher MP camera body - the highest of any currently available in the 35mm format.
- It's a fact that Canon does not have a camera body with equivalent MP in the 35mm format.
- It's a fact that a lot of people here are talking about the d800.
- It's a fact that the d800 is cheaper than the 5D3 and could tempt buyers.
- It's a fact that Canon won't ignore the d800 (unless they just don't care about the competition).
- It's a fact that Canon is focusing a segment of their product development on the cinema market (see the C300).
- It's a fact that Nikon does not have a cinema line of bodies.
- It's a fact that professional photographers will evaluate all imaging products and choose the camera that gives them the highest quality image - regardless of brand loyalty.
If you think I'm making personal judgments, I think you would be wrong, and in my mind - be it a conscious decision or not - you're ignoring the impact the d800 could have on the dSLR market. I think an objective evaluation of the competition is prudent, especially when it potentially offers a better image at a lower cost. What pro photographer would not want to consider all the options available to him?
Where is the folly in that approach? And I'm asking sincerely - not just to start some flame war.