My response was not one of the choices.
To me technology is a means to solve a problem. As long as existing technology fully solves the problem, I see no reason to change technologies. Simply because a new technology exists, does not mean that existing technology is not sufficient.
However, as soon as the existing technology no longer fully solves the problem, or more accurately, the costs of existing technologies exceed a threshold, I have no problem embracing the new technology.
Technology is a tool. I hold no emotional attachment to it. I am neither a "techophile" nor a "technophobe".
To me technology is a means to solve a problem. As long as existing technology fully solves the problem, I see no reason to change technologies. Simply because a new technology exists, does not mean that existing technology is not sufficient.
However, as soon as the existing technology no longer fully solves the problem, or more accurately, the costs of existing technologies exceed a threshold, I have no problem embracing the new technology.
Technology is a tool. I hold no emotional attachment to it. I am neither a "techophile" nor a "technophobe".
Upvote
0