expatinasia said:What surprises me is Canon has again released a brand new XD series without a headphone jack.
The 1D X does not have one and now this latest model from Canon does not have one.
neuroanatomist said:expatinasia said:What surprises me is Canon has again released a brand new XD series without a headphone jack.
The 1D X does not have one and now this latest model from Canon does not have one.
But the 1D C does, as does the 5DIII. Seems like Canon is differentiating between bodies that can shoot video (which is all of the current ones, obviously), and bodies that are intended to be used for video.
neuroanatomist said:Canon-F1 said:i fully understand what you say... but then... this is a new product.
when a new product is not better then a older one there is no sense in wasting money on it.
that´s why i critizise the 6D video.
Define 'better'. For some people, the lower cost of the 6D makes it significantly better, especially if the IQ is no worse...
keithfullermusic said:maybe i'm an idiot, but i thought that it looked really good.
That was one of the biggest advantages for me considering 6D: Wifi + video -> like external monitor android smartphone or tablet+ similar video quality like MarkIII, but now I even don't know what to say. Also I think Its to early to make conclusion only from one test. Maybe results from final product will be better.schmidtfilme said:I hear the video quality is more on par with the Mark 2.
In addition what I just found out today and made my cry is that the Canon 6D cannot be controlled over Wifi for shooting video. Thats too bad because that was what I really hoped for.
Canon - why ? On the manual page 15 it says - when Wifi is enabled movie shooting is disabled http://t.co/hl4QR6Og
I guess I get the Mark 2 or Mark 3 instead. Just not sure if the Mark 3 is worth the money over the Mark 2. . .
expatinasia said:That's fine, and I can understand the logic (sort of). But if that is what they are doing then why bother sticking video in at all. Surely a headphone jack can't be that big a deal for the engineers or the camera itself, but I am not an engineer.
I am one of those guys that thinks if you are going to do something do it right, and as it is almost 2013 and as this new 6D does have video then in my eyes it should have a headphone jack. And the 1D X as the flagship should have all the bells and whistles.
expatinasia said:No comment on the video as I have not watched it.
What surprises me is Canon has again released a brand new XD series without a headphone jack.
The 1D X does not have one and now this latest model from Canon does not have one.
Not all of us want to use external recorders to monitor sound levels during a recording.
Bizarre.
Canon-F1 said:i say "fuk you canon"..... i sit on my money and stick to my 5D MK2 a few years longer.![]()
Its not a matter of if they can, but how they target the market with options on diff cameras. They could make it possible to record all your user settings on a 5DM3 but they don't they leave that for the 1D series cameras.expatinasia said:neuroanatomist said:expatinasia said:What surprises me is Canon has again released a brand new XD series without a headphone jack.
The 1D X does not have one and now this latest model from Canon does not have one.
But the 1D C does, as does the 5DIII. Seems like Canon is differentiating between bodies that can shoot video (which is all of the current ones, obviously), and bodies that are intended to be used for video.
That's fine, and I can understand the logic (sort of). But if that is what they are doing then why bother sticking video in at all. Surely a headphone jack can't be that big a deal for the engineers or the camera itself, but I am not an engineer.
I am one of those guys that thinks if you are going to do something do it right, and as it is almost 2013 and as this new 6D does have video then in my eyes it should have a headphone jack. And the 1D X as the flagship should have all the bells and whistles.
Will be interesting to see what they do with the 7D ii and the new High MP cameras.
crazyrunner33 said:Canon has and will always put photography before video, the line skipping method of downsampling proves it. I would be happy to have just a Canon Rebel that could properly downsample the sensor for 1080p with a method other than line skipping.
daltech said:I talked to a Canon representative two weeks ago here in Ottawa at a photography show about the 6D which I had in my hands, and he was honnest. He said the 6D was designed for people wanting a full frame for the image quality, while family travelling, hence the size, I can see the video quality and features being adequate for that purpose. I currently own a 40D, and use 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM II lens 99% of time on it to shoot sports, and for sports portrait I was thinking of getting the 6D, he told me that the AF speed would be a tad faster than my 40D, but that's it, and I can see while on a family trip that being quite sufficient.
I think the video will be just fine for shooting some video on trip while carrying one body, and a full frame with that.
expatinasia said:So for those that do not think Canon should have put a headphone jack in this (what US$ 2000?) camera, and then (some at least) go on about external recorders, why do they bother to put a mic jack in?
Do not get me wrong, I won't be buying this camera, and have equal interest in video as stills, but I just do not get why Canon are producing such new cameras without such basic jacks.
All I am trying to say is if you put a mic jack in a camera of this price level then I think there should automatically be a headphone jack as well. Give the user the choice to use what he/she prefers.
I think we would all agree monitoring sound via some sound bars on a screen is one of the worse things you can do.