The mythical 3D question

[APBPhoto]

I was wondering if the mythical 3D high MP camera is suppose to sit in between the 5DMIII and the 1Dx won't the price also sit between them say "$4999", if that is the case will there be less complaining about the price of the 5DMIII?

 

[Mt Spokane Photography]

It is indeed a myth, so you can make up any price level you wish. I doubt that we will see one soon. The 4K body will likely have a "C" designation for Cinema.

 

[poias]

It would be stupid for Canon (or any manufacturer) to call a 2-dimensional camera "3D". In fact, that would be a marketing disaster. That being said, Canon, for its own sake, has to come with a high mpx FF soon, or it will get killed by Nikon and Sony.

 

[Orion]

It would be stupid for Canon (or any manufacturer) to call a 2-dimensional camera "3D". In fact, that would be a marketing disaster. That being said, Canon, for its own sake, has to come with a high mpx FF soon, or it will get killed by Nikon and Sony.

it's called 3D because it is between the 5D and the 1Dx. . . . . the smaller the number, the more pro the camera

it has nothing to do with 3D vision v 2D vision. . . . :

 

[meli]

I was wondering if the mythical 3D high MP camera is suppose to sit in between the 5DMIII and the 1Dx won't the price also sit between them say "$4999", if that is the case will there be less complaining about the price of the 5DMIII?

No. The complaining about the current price is about the amount of tech you get for it, and mainly cause of the +500 over the competition.